ArticleMental health in family medicine2008
Depression case management by practice nurses in primary care: an audit.
Article in Mental health in family medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling the power of sense of coherence: a key predictor of symptom severity among depressive disorders clients.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Mental health task-sharing in South Africa - a role for clinical associates?BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Nursing Care Coordination for Patients with Complex Needs in Primary Healthcare: A Scoping Review.International journal of integrated care · 2021Article
- Structured pro-active care for chronic depression by practice nurses in primary care: a qualitative evaluation.PloS one · 2013Article
- A feasibility study of a telephone-supported self-care intervention for depression among adults with a comorbid chronic physical illness in primary care.Mental health in family medicine · 2012Article
- General practitioners' management of mental disorders: a rewarding practice with considerable obstacles.BMC family practice · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Depression is a common and debilitating condition. A body of evidence exists about improving depression outcomes in primary care, using collaborative care models. Such approaches, however, have not been routinely adopted within general practice settings. In this paper we outline the results of an audit of an enhanced care initiative that trained practice nurses to deliver such approaches.Method An audit of symptom outcome and satisfaction was conducted in depression case-management clinics run by practice nurses. Results were then benchmarked against appropriate randomised trial data. The cost of practice nurse time devoted to the delivery of the service was estimated by multiplying time by unit cost.Results A mean change of 9.07 (standard deviation (SD) 6.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.93-10.22, P < 0.001) points on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) score was observed in those who were using/had used the service. Clinical change demonstrated a shift from moderate-to-severe to mild depression. The results reflect the changes seen in randomised controlled trial data from similar interventions in similar samples, and are superior to expected treatment as usual outcomes. Overall, respondents were 'very satisfied' with the service on offer. The mean cost of practice nurse time was estimated at £45 per patient.Discussion While acknowledging the limitations of audit data, practice nurses in general practice appear to be able to offer effective and acceptable case management to patients experiencing depression.
Identifiers
22477856PMC2777566What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.