Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22477855›Full record

ArticleMental health in family medicine2008

Cross-sectional survey of patients in receipt of long-term repeat prescriptions for antidepressant drugs in primary care.

Gillian Cruickshank, Steve Macgillivray, David Bruce, Anne Mather, Keith Matthews, Brian Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mental health in family medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. The role of empathy in antidepressant withdrawal.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Long-term antidepressant use in general practice: a qualitative study of GPs' views on discontinuation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. VitalSignPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gillian CruickshankPractice Pharmacist, Princes Street Surgery, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Steve Macgillivray
David Bruce
Anne Mather
Keith Matthews
Brian Williams

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This cross-sectional survey describes the clinical characteristics of 92 patients from across 12 general medical practices, in receipt of a long-term repeat prescription of an antidepressant for the treatment of depression. Psychiatric diagnoses were determined using the Schedule for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. Fifty-three participants (57.6%) failed to meet criteria for any psychiatric diagnosis (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.5-67.7%). Independent clinical assessments based upon diagnoses and other clinical data indicated that 26 (31.0%) participants (95% CI: 28.9-49.7%) had no clear clinical reason for continued receipt of an antidepressant. Reasons for the continued use of antidepressants in this population require further investigation.

Identifiers

PMID22477855
PMCPMC2777559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.