ArticleThe International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc2010
A comparative study of restenosis rates in bare metal and drug-eluting stents.
Article in The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revitalizing Colchicine: Novel Delivery Platforms and Derivatives to Expand Its Therapeutic Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- Investigation of 3D Printed Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Crimping Behavior.Advanced materials technologies · 2024Article
- Nano-embedded medical devices and delivery systems in interventional radiology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023Review
- Risk investigation of in-stent restenosis after initial implantation of intracoronary drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Risk factors associated with intra-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Some Perspectives on Hypersensitivity to Coronary Stents.International journal of general medicine · 2021Review
- The risk for subsequent coronary interventions in a local Polish population.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2020Article
- Occurrence and predictive factors of restenosis in coronary heart disease patients underwent sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.Irish journal of medical science · 2020Article
- Reduced histologic neo in-stent restenosis after use of a paclitaxel-coated cutting balloon in porcine coronary arteries.Histology and histopathology · 2020Article
- Experimental Tests, FEM Constitutive Modeling and Validation of PLGA Bioresorbable Polymer for Stent Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- In-Stent Restenosis and a Drug-Coated Balloon: Insights from a Clinical Therapeutic Strategy on Coronary Artery Diseases.Cardiology research and practice · 2020Review
- The clinical effects of CYP2C19 *2 allele frequency on Palestinian patients receiving clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019Article
- Electrospraying an enabling technology for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications: A review.Journal of aerosol science · 2018Article
- Evaluation of relationship between common carotid artery intima-media thickness and coronary in-stent restenosis: A case-control study.Interventional medicine & applied science · 2018Article
- Human pluripotent stem cells: Towards therapeutic development for the treatment of lifestyle diseases.World journal of stem cells · 2016Review
- An agent-based model of the response to angioplasty and bare-metal stent deployment in an atherosclerotic blood vessel.PloS one · 2014Article
- Association of smoking with restenosis and major adverse cardiac events after coronary stenting: A meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious studies have been performed throughout the world on the rate of restenosis using bare metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES). The prohibitive costs associated with DES generally dictate the type of stent used, especially in developing countries. Therefore, there was a need for a study to assess the effect of various risk factors on restenosis in BMS and DES in the Indian context. A study was performed in the premier institution of the Indian Armed Forces, the Army Hospital (Research and Referral), New Delhi, India, under the aegis of the Indian Council of Medical Research (New Delhi). The profile of patients in the armed forces is inherently diverse in terms of demography, ethnicity, genetics, etc, which reflects the diverse and varied nature of the population in India. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 130 patients were included in the present study. Follow-up after stent implantation was scheduled for six to nine months following the procedure to assess symptoms, drug compliance, and treadmill test and coronary angiography results, and to ascertain the incidence of restenosis. However, only 80 patients returned for follow-up and, therefore, the final analysis was based on these patients. They were segregated into BMS (n=41) and DES (n=39) groups. Restenosis occurred in 29 patients (36.3%). Nine of 39 patients with DES (23.1%) and 20 of 41 patients with BMS (48.8%) developed restenosis. There was a statistically significant relationship between restenosis and female sex, clinical presentation before intervention and at the time of follow-up evaluation (unstable angina), hypertension, positive stress test and compliance with medical therapy (P<0.05). No statistically significant relationship was observed between restenosis and age, diabetes, smoking, obesity and diet (P>0.05).
conclusionsDES appear to reduce the restenosis rate and clinical end points, and appear to be more cost effective than BMS. Patient-related factors (eg, sex, hypertension and unstable angina) are important variables that affect the restenosis rate. Noninvasive stress testing had high positive and negative predictive values. Therefore, based on the present study, noninvasive stress testing is suggested before routine angiography at follow-up, which will reduce the need for repeat coronary angiography.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.