Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22477415›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc2008

Three-dimensional aortic aneurysm model and endovascular repair: an educational tool for surgical trainees.

Chumpon Wilasrusmee, Jesada Suvikrom, Jackrit Suthakorn, Panuwat Lertsithichai, Kriskrai Sitthiseriprapip, Napaphat Proprom, Dilip S Kittur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Integration of high-resolution mixed reality models into resident training.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Medical 3D Printing for the Radiologist.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chumpon WilasrusmeeDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University,270 Rama VI Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand. racwl@mahidol.ac.th
Jesada Suvikrom
Jackrit Suthakorn
Panuwat Lertsithichai
Kriskrai Sitthiseriprapip
Napaphat Proprom
Dilip S Kittur

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEndovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a current valid treatment option for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The success of EVAR depends on the selection of appropriate patients, which requires detailed knowledge of the patient's vascular anatomy and preoperative planning. Three-dimensional (3D) models of AAA using a rapid prototyping technique were developed to help surgical trainees learn how to plan for EVAR more effectively.

methodFour cases of AAA were used as prototypes for the models. Nine questions associated with preoperative planning for EVAR were developed by a group of experts in the field of endovascular surgery. Forty-three postgraduate trainees in general surgery participated in the present study. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups. The 'intervention' group was provided with the rapid prototyping AAA models along with 3D computed tomography (CT) corresponding to the cases of the test, while the control group was provided with 3D CTs only.

resultsDifferences in the scores between the groups were tested using the unpaired t test. The mean test scores were consistently and significantly higher in the 3D CT group with models compared with the 3D CT group without models for all four cases. Age, year of training, sex and previous EVAR experience had no effect on the scores.

conclusionThe 3D aortic aneurysm model constructed using the rapid prototype technique may significantly improve the ability of trainees to properly plan for EVAR.

Identifiers

PMID22477415
PMCPMC2727766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.