ArticleThe Analysis of verbal behavior2005
The effects of deprivation, presession exposure, and preferences on teaching manding to children with autism.
Article in The Analysis of verbal behavior, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Clinical Tutorial on Methods to Capture and Contrive Establishing Operations to Teach Mands.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Article
- A Review of the Environmental Variables Included in Mand Training Interventions.The Analysis of verbal behavior · 2024Review
- Evaluation of a Treatment Package to Increase Mean Length of Utterances for Children with Autism.Behavior analysis in practice · 2020Article
- Empirical Application of Skinner's Verbal Behavior to Interventions for Children with Autism: A Review.The Analysis of verbal behavior · 2017Article
- Increasing the mand repertoire of children with autism through the use of an interrupted chain procedure.Behavior analysis in practice · 2012Article
- General outcome measures for verbal operants.The Analysis of verbal behavior · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of at least 23-hr deprivation, 5-min presession exposure, and individual preference on the acquisition of mands were investigated in these studies. Two boys who were 2.5 years old and diagnosed with autism participated in the studies. Preference assessments were conducted to identify preference levels of various toys. Toys of various preferences were then assigned to either a 23-hr deprivation or 5-min presession exposure condition for mand training. Both deprivation and preference level affected acquisition of mands. Implications for teaching children to mand are discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.