Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22476809›Full record

Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2012

Docetaxel and cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy versus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in treatment for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical study.

Tao Zhao, Hao Chen, Tingrong Zhang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tao ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Jiangyin People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Jiangyin, 214400, China.
Hao Chen
Tingrong Zhang
Southeast University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This randomized clinical study was to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of two chemoradiotherapy (cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil + radiotherapy and cisplatin + docetaxel + radiotherapy) regimens in patients with unresectable local advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Previously untreated patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma were randomly assigned into two groups (each had 45 patients): cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil + radiotherapy (PF) group and cisplatin + docetaxel + radiotherapy (DP) group. All patients received radiotherapy of 50.4 Gy (28 fractions of 1.8 Gy) over 5 weeks (5 fractions a week). Chemotherapy for PF group comprises 5-fluorouracil at days 1-4 (250 mg/m(2)/day) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) at day 1 of every 28-day cycle; full treatment course included 4 cycles. Chemotherapy for DP group comprises docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) at day 1 of every 28-day cycle; full treatment course included 4 cycles. Response, survival, progression and toxicity of both regimens were studied. Overall response rate (ORR) was 53.3 % for PF group and 73.3 % for DP group. Median overall survival (OS) time was 22.3 months for PF group and 43.2 group months for DP: Patients of DP group had a significant longer overall median survival time (P < 0.05). Toxicity was acceptable; patients of PF group and patients of DP group did not showed significant difference in serious haematological event incidence (24.4 vs. 35.6 %, P > 0.05). ORR and OS favour DP over PF in the treatment of patients with unresectable local advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

RadiotherapyAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyDocetaxelEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedCisplatinDocetaxelFluorouracilTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID22476809
OpenAlexW2151969982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.