ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2012
Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostics in children: 2. Methodological issues for conducting and reporting research evaluations of tuberculosis diagnostics for intrathoracic tuberculosis in children. Consensus from an expert panel.
Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03767946 (MTBVAC in Newborns), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
MTBVAC in Newborns: Epidemiological Study In Tuberculosis-Endemic Regions of Sub-Saharan Africa
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- FujiLAM for the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis: a systematic review.BMJ paediatrics open · 2022Pooled it
- Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Among Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- Tuberculosis in childhood: a systematic review of national and international guidelines.BMC infectious diseases · 2014Pooled it
- Approaches and processes for paediatric chest X-ray classification used in the SHINE TB treatment-shortening trial.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2024Trial
- Prospective evaluation of GeneXpert for the diagnosis of HIV- negative pediatric TB cases.BMC infectious diseases · 2015Trial
- Blood or Urine IP-10 Cannot Discriminate between Active Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases Different from Tuberculosis in Children.BioMed research international · 2015Trial
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Chest X-Ray-Based Telemedicine Platform for Pediatric Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Low-Resource Settings: Development and Validation Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2024Article
- Evaluation of serological assays for the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis disease: a study protocol.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Xpert-Ultra Assay in Stool and Urine Samples to Improve Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Children: The Médecins Sans Frontières Experience in Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- A stool based qPCR for the diagnosis of TB in children and people living with HIV in Uganda, Eswatini and Mozambique (Stool4TB): a protocol for a multicenter diagnostic evaluation.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Point-of-care ultrasound for tuberculosis diagnosis in children: a Médecins Sans Frontières cross-sectional study in Guinea-Bissau.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Multidrug-Resistant TB (MDR-TB) and Extensively Drug-Resistant TB (XDR-TB) Among Children: Where We Stand Now.Cureus · 2023Review
- The Quest for a Child-Friendly Tuberculosis Triage Test.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2022Article
- Incident Tuberculosis Diagnoses in Children at High Risk for Disease.Open forum infectious diseases · 2021Article
- The Kynurenine/Tryptophan Ratio Is a Sensitive Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Tuberculosis Among Indian Children.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Observational
- Is exclusive breastfeeding for six-months protective against pediatric tuberculosis?Global health action · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Confirming the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis is a major challenge. However, research on childhood tuberculosis as it relates to better diagnostics is often neglected because of technical difficulties, such as the slow growth in culture, the difficulty of obtaining specimens, and the diverse and relatively nonspecific clinical presentation of tuberculosis in this age group. Researchers often use individually designed criteria for enrollment, diagnostic classifications, and reference standards, thereby hindering the interpretation and comparability of their findings. The development of standardized research approaches and definitions is therefore needed to strengthen the evaluation of new diagnostics for detection and confirmation of tuberculosis in children. In this article we present consensus statements on methodological issues for conducting research of Tuberculosis diagnostics among children, with a focus on intrathoracic tuberculosis. The statements are complementary to a clinical research case definition presented in an accompanying publication and suggest a phased approach to diagnostics evaluation; entry criteria for enrollment; methods for classification of disease certainty, including the rational use of culture within the case definition; age categories and comorbidities for reporting results; and the need to use standard operating procedures. Special consideration is given to the performance of microbiological culture in children and we also recommend for alternative methodological approaches to report findings in a standardized manner to overcome these limitations are made. This consensus statement is an important step toward ensuring greater rigor and comparability of pediatric tuberculosis diagnostic research, with the aim of realizing the full potential of better tests for children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.