Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22476590›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2012

Paraspeckle nuclear bodies--useful uselessness?

Shinichi Nakagawa, Tetsuro Hirose

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Getting to the bottom of lncRNA mechanism: structure-function relationships.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. lncRNAs in T lymphocytes: RNA regulation at the heart of the immune response.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Controlling nuclear RNA levels.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Deciphering p53 signaling in tumor suppression.Current opinion in cell biology · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shinichi NakagawaRNA Biology Laboratory, RIKEN Advanced Science Institute, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan. nakagawas@riken.jp
Tetsuro Hirose
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPRIKEN Advanced Science Institute · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleus of higher eukaryotes, such as humans and mice, is compartmentalized into multiple nuclear bodies, an organization that allows for the regulation of complex gene expression pathways that are characteristic of these organisms. Paraspeckles are recently discovered, mammalian-specific nuclear bodies built on a long, non-protein-coding RNA, NEAT1 (nuclear-enriched abundant transcript 1), which assembles various protein components including RNA-binding proteins of the DBHS (Drosophila behavior and human splicing) family. Paraspeckles have been proposed to control several biological processes, such as stress responses and cellular differentiation, but their function at the whole animal level remains unclear. In this review, we summarize a series of studies on paraspeckles that have been carried out in the decade since their discovery and discuss their physiological function and molecular mechanism.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansIntranuclear Inclusion BodiesMiceNuclear ProteinsRNA EditingRNA, UntranslatedNuclear ProteinsRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID22476590
PMCPMC3428521
OpenAlexW2020328382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.