ArticleRheumatology international2013
Discriminative and diagnostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies in Iranian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody combined with rheumatoid factor in rheumatoid arthritis in Asia: a meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of high-frequency color Doppler ultrasonography examination in combination with anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody testing in rheumatoid arthritis patients.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most studies on the diagnostic utility of the anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) test in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been performed in developed countries, with only a few done in the developing world. We undertook a cross-sectional study to determine the diagnostic utility of the rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-CCP tests in urbanized Iranians with early RA. One hundred and ninety-three serum samples were obtained from consecutive patients who were diagnosed with RA. Serum samples of 254 ones without RA, consisting of other inflammatory polyarthritis disorders, were also collected as controls. RF was measured for IgM by latex agglutination test, and titers higher than 1/80 were considered positive. Anti-CCP was also assayed using an ELISA with 6.25 RU/ml as the threshold for a positive result. The anti-CCP had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for a diagnosis of RA of 47.2, 92.9, 83.5, and 69.8 %, respectively. Those for RF were 57.0, 83.9, 72.8, and 72.0 %, respectively. For anti-CCP antibodies in combination with RF, they were 38.9, 96.5, 89.3, and 67.5 %, respectively. Anti-CCP has higher specificity and predictive values compared with the RF parameter in diagnosing RA in Iranian patients, but their discriminative values were similar. Anti-CCP and RF in combination further increases the diagnostic value for RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.