Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22476066›Full record

ArticleAoB PLANTS2010

Multifunctional crop trait ontology for breeders' data: field book, annotation, data discovery and semantic enrichment of the literature.

Rosemary Shrestha, Elizabeth Arnaud, Ramil Mauleon, Martin Senger, Guy F Davenport, David Hancock, Norman Morrison, Richard Bruskiewich, Graham McLaren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AoB PLANTS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Post-composing ontology terms for efficient phenotyping in plant breeding.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Using knowledge graphs to infer gene expression in plants.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023
    Article
  10. CerealsDB: A Whistle-Stop Tour of an Open Access SNP Resource.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. CerealsDB-new tools for the analysis of the wheat genome: update 2020.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rosemary ShresthaIRRI-CIMMYT Crop Research Informatics Laboratory (CRIL), Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Máiz y Trigo (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, D.F. , Mexico.
Elizabeth Arnaud
Ramil Mauleon
Martin Senger
Guy F Davenport
David Hancock
Norman Morrison
Richard Bruskiewich
Graham McLaren

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAgricultural crop databases maintained in gene banks of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) are valuable sources of information for breeders. These databases provide comparative phenotypic and genotypic information that can help elucidate functional aspects of plant and agricultural biology. To facilitate data sharing within and between these databases and the retrieval of information, the crop ontology (CO) database was designed to provide controlled vocabulary sets for several economically important plant species. METHODOLOGY: Existing public ontologies and equivalent catalogues of concepts covering the range of crop science information and descriptors for crops and crop-related traits were collected from breeders, physiologists, agronomists, and researchers in the CGIAR consortium. For each crop, relationships between terms were identified and crop-specific trait ontologies were constructed following the Open Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) format standard using the OBO-Edit tool. All terms within an ontology were assigned a globally unique CO term identifier. PRINCIPAL

resultsThe CO currently comprises crop-specific traits for chickpea (Cicer arietinum), maize (Zea mays), potato (Solanum tuberosum), rice (Oryza sativa), sorghum (Sorghum spp.) and wheat (Triticum spp.). Several plant-structure and anatomy-related terms for banana (Musa spp.), wheat and maize are also included. In addition, multi-crop passport terms are included as controlled vocabularies for sharing information on germplasm. Two web-based online resources were built to make these COs available to the scientific community: the 'CO Lookup Service' for browsing the CO; and the 'Crops Terminizer', an ontology text mark-up tool.

conclusionsThe controlled vocabularies of the CO are being used to curate several CGIAR centres' agronomic databases. The use of ontology terms to describe agronomic phenotypes and the accurate mapping of these descriptions into databases will be important steps in comparative phenotypic and genotypic studies across species and gene-discovery experiments.

Identifiers

PMID22476066
PMCPMC3000699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.