ArticleEpilepsy research2012
Recruitment for genetic studies of epilepsy.
Article in Epilepsy research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges Faced by Behavioral Genetic Studies: Researchers Perspective from the MENA Region.Current genomics · 2021Article
- Dietary and lifestyle behavior in adults with epilepsy needs improvement: a case-control study from northeastern Poland.Nutrition journal · 2021Article
- Willingness to participate in genomics research and desire for personal results among underrepresented minority patients: a structured interview study.Journal of community genetics · 2013Article
- Recruiting for epigenetic research: facilitating the informed consent process.Nursing research and practice · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Virtually nothing has been published about recruitment of adults with sporadic temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) for genetic studies. We examined eligibility, recruitment, participation rates, and reasons for exclusion in a genetic study of TLE. Participants with non-acquired TLE with onset ≤35 were recruited through review of records and screening of incoming patients at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC). Eligible patients were asked to participate in an interview about seizures and give a blood sample for DNA extraction. Medical records were sought for each participant. Of 2974 patients screened 252 (8.5%) were eligible, and 40 (15.9% of eligible) participated. Leading reasons for ineligibility included an antecedent cause of epilepsy, syndrome other than TLE, and seizure onset after age 35. Those declining participation cited concerns about confidentiality, lack of compensation, and fear of phlebotomy. Although TLE is common and patients were recruited from a major surgical epilepsy center, a small proportion of potential participants participated. Large numbers need to be screened to reach the target sample size. Obtaining permission from treating physicians to contact their patients directly can improve recruitment. Saliva DNA collection, monetary incentives and patient education can improve participation. This information can facilitate study design in epilepsy genetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.