Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22475283›Full record

ArticleExpert review of hematology2012

Are reduced-intensity transplants safe in older patients with hematologic malignancies?

Rachel E Protheroe, David I Marks

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of hematology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel E ProtheroeBone Marrow Transplant Unit,University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK.
David I Marks
Bristol Royal Hospital for Children · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a potentially curative therapy for older patients with hematologic malignancies. However, the treatment modality is underutilized and, to date, there are only limited data on outcomes in people older than 60 years. This study describes the toxicities and outcomes of non-myeloablative allogeneic HCT, conditioned with low-dose total body irradiation with or without fludarabine, in patients aged 60-75 years enrolled in prospective multicenter clinical trials. Increasing age was not associated with adverse outcome. Relapse risk and comorbidity burden predicted survival; fit patients with low risk of disease relapse did well after transplant regardless of age. Despite demonstrating the feasibility of non-myeloablative allogeneic HCT in patients aged 60-75 years, the study raises important questions regarding how best to manage older patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies and how to optimize our approach to allogeneic HCT in this age group.

Identifiers

PMID22475283
OpenAlexW2044301125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.