Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22474181›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2012

CellSeT: novel software to extract and analyze structured networks of plant cells from confocal images.

Michael P Pound, Andrew P French, Darren M Wells, Malcolm J Bennett, Tony P Pridmore

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fluctuating auxin response gradients determine pavement cell-shape acquisition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quantitative plant biology · 2020
    Article
  15. LSM-WBMC systems biology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ThePlant physiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael P PoundCentre for Plant Integrative Biology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham LE12 5RD, United Kingdom. michael.pound@nottingham.ac.uk
Andrew P French
Darren M Wells
Malcolm J Bennett
Tony P Pridmore
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D019613/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H020314/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council REI20541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is increasingly important in life sciences that many cell-scale and tissue-scale measurements are quantified from confocal microscope images. However, extracting and analyzing large-scale confocal image data sets represents a major bottleneck for researchers. To aid this process, CellSeT software has been developed, which utilizes tissue-scale structure to help segment individual cells. We provide examples of how the CellSeT software can be used to quantify fluorescence of hormone-responsive nuclear reporters, determine membrane protein polarity, extract cell and tissue geometry for use in later modeling, and take many additional biologically relevant measures using an extensible plug-in toolset. Application of CellSeT promises to remove subjectivity from the resulting data sets and facilitate higher-throughput, quantitative approaches to plant cell research.

Indexed as

SoftwareStatistics as TopicArabidopsisBiomarkersCell MembraneCell NucleusFluorescenceGenes, ReporterImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, ConfocalPlant CellsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID22474181
PMCPMC3398551
OpenAlexW2115403650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.