Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22473786›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2013

The effect of fresh bone marrow cells on reconstruction of mouse calvarial defect combined with calvarial osteoprogenitor cells and collagen-apatite scaffold.

Xiaohua Yu, Liping Wang, Fei Peng, Xi Jiang, Zengmin Xia, Jianping Huang, David Rowe, Mei Wei

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bone tissue engineering with a collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold and culture expanded bone marrow stromal cells.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaohua YuDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Liping Wang
Fei Peng
Xi Jiang
Zengmin Xia
Jianping Huang
David Rowe
Mei Wei
UConn Health · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

4-D Imaging Cell/Scaffold Interplays During In Vivo Bone Repair ProcessR21AR059962 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI ROWE, DAVID W., WEI, MEI · 2011 to 2012
$382k
NIAMS NIH HHS 1R21AR059962-01A1NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR059962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fresh bone marrow cells have already exhibited its advantages as osteogenic donor cells, but the combination between fresh bone marrow cells and other donor cells utilized for bone healing has not been fully explored. To highlight the impact of fresh bone marrow cells on scaffold-based bone regeneration, single or a combination of calvarial osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs) and bone marrow cells (BMCs) were used as donor cells combined with collagen-apatite scaffold for calvarial defect healing. The host and donor contributions to bone formation were assessed using histological and GFP imaging analysis. Although the amount of new bone formed by different cell sources did not show significant differences, the origin of the bone formation in the defects mainly depended on the types of donor cells employed: when only calvarial OPCs were used as donor cells, a donor-derived bone healing instead of host-derived bone ingrowth was observed; when only fresh BMCs were loaded, the host bone could grow into the defect along the lamellar structure of the scaffolds, but the amount of new bone formed was significantly lower than the defect loaded with calvarial OPCs only. The combination of calvarial OPCs and fresh BMCs had similar amount of new bone formation as the group loaded with calvarial osteoprogenitors alone, but did not induce any host-derived bone formation. These results provide compelling evidence of the importance of fresh BMCs to induce host-implant integration in bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Acid PhosphataseAnimalsApatitesBone Marrow CellsBone Marrow TransplantationCollagenDisease Models, AnimalGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIsoenzymesMiceOsteoclastsProsthesis ImplantationRatsRegenerative MedicineSkullStaining and LabelingAcid PhosphataseApatitesCollagenGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIsoenzymesTartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatasebone tissue engineeringfresh bone marrow cellsgreen fluorescence proteinhost integrationosteoblasts

Identifiers

PMID22473786
PMCPMC4053253
OpenAlexW1828000364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.