ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2012
Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.
Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessment of cancer screening effectiveness in the era of screening programs.European journal of epidemiology · 2020Pooled it
- Prevalence of incidental breast cancer and precursor lesions in autopsy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2017Pooled it
- Quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening: a systematic review of methods.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2015Pooled it
- Screening for breast cancer with mammography.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Breast cancer incidence, by stage at diagnosis, and mortality in 21 European countries in the era of mammography screening: an international population-based study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- High reliability Ag/Ni/NiO nanowire-based SERS for cancer detection: a study on breast cancer.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Screen-Detected Breast Cancer Outcomes by Mammography Participation in Immediate Past Screening.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Screening programmes and breast cancer mortality: an observational study of 194 countries.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Observational
- Fecal Immunochemical Testing and the Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia: A Difference-In-Difference Analysis.JCO global oncology · 2024Article
- Overdiagnosis Due to Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer among Women Aged 40 Years and Over: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Working with Convex Responses: Antifragility from Finance to Oncology.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Breast Cancer Screening and Perceptions of Harm among Young Adults in Japan: Results of a Cross-Sectional Online Survey.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- A population health assessment of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality in North Carolina.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Cancer overdiagnosis: a challenge in the era of screening.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2022Article
- Personalized Screening for Breast Cancer: Rationale, Present Practices, and Future Directions.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Review
- Estimations of overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening vary between 0% and over 50%: why?BMJ open · 2021Review
- Extending screening intervals for women at low risk of breast cancer: do they find it acceptable?BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Poor Biological Factors and Prognosis of Interval Breast Cancers: Long-Term Results of Bahçeşehir (Istanbul) Breast Cancer Screening Project in Turkey.JCO global oncology · 2020Article
- An exploration for quantification of overdiagnosis and its effect for breast cancer screening.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020Article
- Breast cancer incidence, mortality and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) are associated with human development, 1990-2016: evidence from Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2019Article
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- SummaryForPatientsIn
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecise quantification of overdiagnosis of breast cancer (defined as the percentage of cases of cancer that would not have become clinically apparent in a woman's lifetime without screening) due to mammography screening has been hampered by lack of valid comparison groups that identify incidence trends attributable to screening versus those due to temporal trends in incidence.
objectiveTo estimate the percentage of overdiagnosis of breast cancer attributable to mammography screening.
designComparison of invasive breast cancer incidence with and without screening.
settingA nationwide mammography screening program in Norway (inviting women aged 50 to 69 years), gradually implemented from 1996 to 2005.
participantsThe Norwegian female population. MEASUREMENTS: Concomitant incidence of invasive breast cancer from 1996 to 2005 in counties where the screening program was implemented compared with that in counties where the program was not yet implemented. To adjust for changes in temporal trends in breast cancer incidence, incidence rates during the preceding decade were also examined. The percentage of overdiagnosis was calculated by accounting for the expected decrease in incidence following cessation of screening after age 69 years (approach 1) and by comparing incidence in the current screening group with incidence among women 2 and 5 years older in the historical screening groups, accounting for average lead time (approach 2).
resultsA total of 39,888 patients with invasive breast cancer were included, 7793 of whom were diagnosed after the screening program started. The estimated rate of overdiagnosis attributable to the program was 18% to 25% (P < 0.001) for approach 1 and 15% to 20% (P < 0.001) for approach 2. Thus, 15% to 25% of cases of cancer are overdiagnosed, translating to 6 to 10 women overdiagnosed for every 2500 women invited. LIMITATION: The study was registry-based.
conclusionMammography screening entails a substantial amount of overdiagnosis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Norwegian Research Council and Frontier Science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22473436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.