Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22472523›Full record

Trial reportAddictive behaviors2012

Enhanced motivational interviewing versus brief advice for adolescent smoking cessation: results from a randomized clinical trial.

Suzanne M Colby, Jessica Nargiso, Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw, Nancy P Barnett, Jane Metrik, William Lewander, Robert H Woolard, Damaris J Rohsenow, Peter M Monti

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addictive behaviors, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of Brief Interventions to Encourage Quit Attempts in Smokers From Socioeconomic Disadvantage.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluating Motivational Interviewing in the Physician Assistant Curriculum.The journal of physician assistant education : the official journal of the Physician Assistant Education Association · 2017
    Article
  18. An Adaptation of Motivational Interviewing Increases Quit Attempts in Smokers With Serious Mental Illness.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Suzanne M ColbyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box G-S121, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Suzanne_Colby@brown.edu
Jessica Nargiso
Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw
Nancy P Barnett
Jane Metrik
William Lewander
Robert H Woolard
Damaris J Rohsenow
Peter M Monti

Funding

Substance Abuse Intervention/Outcome Research TrainingT32DA016184 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Damaris J. Rohsenow, JENNIFER W. TIDEY · 2003 to 2026
$6.1M
MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING FOR TEEN SMOKERS IN THE ERR01DA011204 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 1997 to 2006
$3.6M
Advancing a Bio-Psycho-Social Alcohol Treatment Research and Mentoring ProgramK05AA019681 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
Brief Alcohol Intervention for School-to-Work TransitionsR01AA016000 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI COLBY, SUZANNE M · 2009 to 2010
$1.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS 1R01 AA016000NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA019681NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016000NIDA NIH HHS 1R01 DA11204NIDA NIH HHS 1T32 DA016184NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011204NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotivational interviewing (MI) is widely used for adolescent smoking cessation but empirical support for this approach is mixed.

methodsAdolescent cigarette smokers 14-18 years old (N=162) were recruited from medical, school, and community settings and randomly assigned to enhanced MI or brief advice (BA) for smoking cessation. MI comprised an in-person individual session, a telephone booster session one week later, and a brief telephone-based parent intervention. BA consisted of standardized brief advice to quit smoking. Assessments occurred at baseline, post-treatment and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow ups.

resultsBiochemically-confirmed 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates were low (e.g., 4.5% for MI; 1.4% for BA at 1 month) and did not differ significantly by group at any follow up. Only those in MI reported significant decreases in cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) from baseline to 1 month. At 3 and 6 months, smokers in both groups reported significantly reduced CPD with no differences between groups. MI reduced perceived norms regarding peer and adult smoking rates, while BA had no effect on normative perceptions. No group differences emerged for self-reported motivation or self-efficacy to quit smoking.

conclusionsFindings support the efficacy of MI for addressing normative misperceptions regarding peer and adult smoking and for modestly reducing CPD in the short-term; however, these effects did not translate to greater smoking abstinence. MI may have more promise as a prelude to more intensive smoking intervention with adolescents than as a stand-alone intervention.

Indexed as

MotivationSmoking PreventionAdolescentBehavior TherapyDirective CounselingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleSelf EfficacySelf ReportSmokingSmoking CessationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22472523
PMCPMC3356495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.