Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22471722›Full record

ReviewNanomedicine (London, England)2012

Cancer stem cells and drug resistance: the potential of nanomedicine.

Serguei Vinogradov, Xin Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 200 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
200citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

200 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A protracted war against cancer drug resistance.Cancer cell international · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

140 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Serguei VinogradovDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Center for Drug Delivery & Nanomedicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6025, USA. vinograd@unmc.edu
Xin Wei

Funding

Overcoming Drug Resistance to Nucleoside Analogs by Tumor-Targeted Active NanoforR01CA136921 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI VINOGRADOV, SERGUEI V · 2009 to 2013
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Properties of the small group of cancer cells called tumor-initiating or cancer stem cells (CSCs) involved in drug resistance, metastasis and relapse of cancers can significantly affect tumor therapy. Importantly, tumor drug resistance seems to be closely related to many intrinsic or acquired properties of CSCs, such as quiescence, specific morphology, DNA repair ability and overexpression of antiapoptotic proteins, drug efflux transporters and detoxifying enzymes. The specific microenvironment (niche) and hypoxic stability provide additional protection against anticancer therapy for CSCs. Thus, CSC-focused therapy is destined to form the core of any effective anticancer strategy. Nanomedicine has great potential in the development of CSC-targeting drugs, controlled drug delivery and release, and the design of novel gene-specific drugs and diagnostic modalities. This review is focused on tumor drug resistance-related properties of CSCs and describes current nanomedicine approaches, which could form the basis of novel combination therapies for eliminating metastatic and CSCs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansNanomedicineNeoplastic Stem CellsSignal TransductionAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22471722
PMCPMC3376090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.