Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22470821›Full record

ArticleJournal of prenatal medicine2007

Non-immune fetal hydrops: Are we doing the appropriate tests each time?

W Kurdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of prenatal medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

W KurdiHead, Section of Perinatology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-immune fetal hydrops is diagnosed when there is fluid accumulation in more than one extravascular space. A long list of etiologies has been found in association with non-immune hydrops. Thorough investigations are needed to be able to identify an underlying cause. There are many recent reports indicating that non-immune hydrops can be an extreme presentation of a number of metabolic disorders, mostly lysosomal storage diseases. The fetal hydrops associated with metabolic disorders is usually severe with very thick skin, massive ascitis, other feature could be seen such as contracture deformities, skeletal abnormalities, hepatosplenomegaly, renal abnormalities, and enlarged nuchal translucency. The diagnosis of a metabolic disorder can be done by a variety of different tests: measuring the level of the specific enzyme or metabolite, histological examination of different organs, or mutation identification. An index case is usually needed to confirm the diagnosis. In-utero diagnosis of a metabolic disorder in the absence of an index case is difficult and only available in selected laboratories around the world. In populations with high consanguinity, these diseases are much more commonly present than what we might think. Routine screening for metabolic diseases especially lysosomal storage diseases should be considered in these populations, and definitely in cases of recurrent hydrops in the same family. More efforts should be spent on identifying causative mutations in different ethnic groups. Every effort should be made to identify the etiology in an index case in the family, as this might be the best opportunity for improving future care.

Identifiers

PMID22470821
PMCPMC3309343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.