Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22470537›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Analysis of clonal type-specific antibody reactions in Toxoplasma gondii seropositive humans from Germany by peptide-microarray.

Pavlo Maksimov, Johannes Zerweck, Aline Maksimov, Andrea Hotop, Uwe Gross, Katrin Spekker, Walter Däubener, Sandra Werdermann, Olaf Niederstrasser, Eckhardt Petri and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Serotyping, a challenging approach forFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Serotyping ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Testing New Peptides FromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Pavlo MaksimovFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Wusterhausen, Germany. pavlo.maksimov@fli.bund.de
Johannes Zerweck
Aline Maksimov
Andrea Hotop
Uwe Gross
Katrin Spekker
Walter Däubener
Sandra Werdermann
Olaf Niederstrasser
Eckhardt Petri
Marc Mertens
Rainer G Ulrich
Franz J Conraths
Gereon Schares
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEBG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle · DEInstitut für Soziale Arbeit · DEJPT Peptide Technologies (Germany) · DENovartis (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent clonal types of Toxoplasma gondii are thought to be associated with distinct clinical manifestations of infections. Serotyping is a novel technique which may allow to determine the clonal type of T. gondii humans are infected with and to extend typing studies to larger populations which include infected but non-diseased individuals. METHODOLOGY: A peptide-microarray test for T. gondii serotyping was established with 54 previously published synthetic peptides, which mimic clonal type-specific epitopes. The test was applied to human sera (n = 174) collected from individuals with an acute T. gondii infection (n = 21), a latent T. gondii infection (n = 53) and from T. gondii-seropositive forest workers (n = 100).

findingsThe majority (n = 124; 71%) of all T. gondii seropositive human sera showed reactions against synthetic peptides with sequences specific for clonal type II (type II peptides). Type I and type III peptides were recognized by 42% (n = 73) or 16% (n = 28) of the human sera, respectively, while type II-III, type I-III or type I-II peptides were recognized by 49% (n = 85), 36% (n = 62) or 14% (n = 25) of the sera, respectively. Highest reaction intensities were observed with synthetic peptides mimicking type II-specific epitopes. A proportion of the sera (n = 22; 13%) showed no reaction with type-specific peptides. Individuals with acute toxoplasmosis reacted with a statistically significantly higher number of peptides as compared to individuals with latent T. gondii infection or seropositive forest workers.

conclusionsType II-specific reactions were overrepresented and higher in intensity in the study population, which was in accord with genotyping studies on T. gondii oocysts previously conducted in the same area. There were also individuals with type I- or type III-specific reactions. Well-characterized reference sera and further specific peptide markers are needed to establish and to perform future serotyping approaches with higher resolution.

Indexed as

Protein Array AnalysisAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanGermanyHumansPeptidesSerotypingToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanPeptides

Identifiers

PMID22470537
PMCPMC3314601
OpenAlexW2006828902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.