Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22470111›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

Evaluation of standard- and high-dose daptomycin versus linezolid against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Ashley D Hall, Molly E Steed, Cesar A Arias, Barbara E Murray, Michael J Rybak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. High-Dose Daptomycin and Clinical Applications.The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessment of TedizolidAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashley D HallAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Molly E Steed
Cesar A Arias
Barbara E Murray
Michael J Rybak
Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Of Daptomycin Resistance In EnterococciR01AI093749 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ARIAS, CESAR AUGUSTO · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Enterococcus faecium virulence: A molecular and therapeutic approachR00AI072961 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ARIAS, CESAR AUGUSTO · 2009 to 2010
$593k
Impact of Daptomycin Dose Exposure on Enterococci and Characterization of ResistaR21AI092055 · NIAID · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RYBAK, MICHAEL JOSEPH · 2011 to 2012
$430k
Enterococcus faecium virulence: A molecular and therapeutic approachK99AI072961 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ARIAS, CESAR AUGUSTO · 2008 to 2008
$91k
NIAID NIH HHS K99 AI072961NIAID NIH HHS R00 AI072961NIAID NIH HHS R00 AI72961NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093749NIAID NIH HHS R01AI093749NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI72961NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI092055NIAID NIH HHS R21AI092055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Daptomycin MICs for enterococci are typically 1- to 2-fold higher than those for Staphylococcus aureus, and there is an imminent need to establish the optimal dose for appropriate treatment of enterococcal infections. We investigated the bactericidal activity of daptomycin at various dose exposures compared to that of linezolid against vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model utilizing simulated endocardial vegetations over 96 h. Daptomycin at doses of 6, 8, 10, and 12 mg/kg of body weight/day and linezolid at a dose of 600 mg every 12 h were evaluated against two clinical vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strains (EFm11499 and 09-184D1051), one of which was linezolid resistant (09-184D1051), and one clinical vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis strain (EFs11496). Daptomycin MICs were 4, 2, and 0.5 μg/ml for EFm11499, 09-184D1051, and EFs11496, respectively. Bactericidal activity, defined as a ≥ 3 log(10) CFU/g reduction from the initial colony count, was demonstrated against all three isolates with all doses of daptomycin; however, bactericidal activity was not sustained with the daptomycin 6- and 8-mg/kg/day regimens. Linezolid was bacteriostatic against EFm11499 and displayed no appreciable activity against 09-184D1051 or EFs11496. Concentration-dependent killing was displayed with more sustained reduction in colony count (3.58 to 6.46 and 5.89 to 6.56 log(10) CFU/g) at 96 h for the simulated regimen of daptomycin at doses of 10 and 12 mg/kg/day, respectively (P ≤ 0.012). No E. faecium mutants with reduced susceptibility were recovered at any dosage regimen; however, the E. faecalis strain developed reduced daptomycin susceptibility with daptomycin at 6, 8, and 10 but not at 12 mg/kg/day. Daptomycin displayed a dose-dependent response against three VRE isolates, with high-dose daptomycin producing sustained bactericidal activity. Further research is warranted.

Indexed as

AcetamidesDaptomycinEndocarditis, BacterialEnterococcusEnterococcus faecalisLinezolidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOxazolidinonesVancomycinAcetamidesDaptomycinLinezolidOxazolidinonesVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID22470111
PMCPMC3370794
OpenAlexW2147375605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.