ArticleSpatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology2012
Error propagation models to examine the effects of geocoding quality on spatial analysis of individual-level datasets.
Article in Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why it's so hard to match residence addresses to census blocks - and how to fix it.Transactions in GIS : TG · 2026Article
- Split and combine simulation extrapolation algorithm to correct geocoding coarsening of built environment exposures.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- The availability of retail tobacco near federally qualified healthcare facilities and addiction treatment centers in New York State.Preventive medicine reports · 2020Article
- Error propagation in spatial modeling of public health data: a simulation approach using pediatric blood lead level data for Syracuse, New York.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2018Article
- An analysis of the process and results of manual geocode correction.Geospatial health · 2017Article
- Influence of Demographic and Health Survey Point Displacements on Raster-Based Analyses.Spatial demography · 2016Article
- Residential proximity to major roadways and incident hypertension in post-menopausal women.Environmental research · 2015Article
- Use of attribute association error probability estimates to evaluate quality of medical record geocodes.International journal of health geographics · 2015Article
- Geocoding health data with Geographic Information Systems: a pilot study in northeast Italy for developing a standardized data-acquiring format.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2015Article
- Use of a Google Map Tool Embedded in an Internet Survey Instrument: Is it a Valid and Reliable Alternative to Geocoded Address Data?JMIR research protocols · 2014Article
- Ensuring Confidentiality of Geocoded Health Data: Assessing Geographic Masking Strategies for Individual-Level Data.Advances in medicine · 2014Review
- Impact of geocoding methods on associations between long-term exposure to urban air pollution and lung function.Environmental health perspectives · 2013Article
- Effects of georeferencing effort on mapping monkeypox case distributions and transmission risk.International journal of health geographics · 2012Article
- A research agenda: does geocoding positional error matter in health GIS studies?Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology · 2012Article
- Physician Multisite Practicing: Impact on Access to Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The quality of geocoding has received substantial attention in recent years. A synthesis of published studies shows that the positional errors of street geocoding are somewhat unique relative to those of other types of spatial data: (1) the magnitude of error varies strongly across urban-rural gradients; (2) the direction of error is not uniform, but strongly associated with the properties of local street segments; (3) the distribution of errors does not follow a normal distribution, but is highly skewed and characterized by a substantial number of very large error values; and (4) the magnitude of error is spatially autocorrelated and is related to properties of the reference data. This makes it difficult to employ analytic approaches or Monte Carlo simulations for error propagation modeling because these rely on generalized statistical characteristics. The current paper describes an alternative empirical approach to error propagation modeling for geocoded data and illustrates its implementation using three different case-studies of geocoded individual-level datasets. The first case-study consists of determining the land cover categories associated with geocoded addresses using a point-in-raster overlay. The second case-study consists of a local hotspot characterization using kernel density analysis of geocoded addresses. The third case-study consists of a spatial data aggregation using enumeration areas of varying spatial resolution. For each case-study a high quality reference scenario based on address points forms the basis for the analysis, which is then compared to the result of various street geocoding techniques. Results show that the unique nature of the positional error of street geocoding introduces substantial noise in the result of spatial analysis, including a substantial amount of bias for some analysis scenarios. This confirms findings from earlier studies, but expands these to a wider range of analytical techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.