Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22468997›Full record

ArticleCellular reprogramming2012

Early aberrations in chromatin dynamics in embryos produced under in vitro conditions.

Rahul S Deshmukh, Olga Østrup, Frantisek Strejcek, Morten Vejlsted, Andrea Lucas-Hahn, Bjorn Petersen, Juan Li, Henrik Callesen, Heiner Niemann, Poul Hyttel

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular reprogramming, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Journal of veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epigenetics: A key paradigm in reproductive health.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Chromatin-linked determinants of zygotic genome activation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rahul S DeshmukhDepartment of Basic Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Olga Østrup
Frantisek Strejcek
Morten Vejlsted
Andrea Lucas-Hahn
Bjorn Petersen
Juan Li
Henrik Callesen
Heiner Niemann
Poul Hyttel
University of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University · DKConstantine the Philosopher University in Nitra · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro production of porcine embryos by means of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is limited by great inefficienciy. The present study investigated chromatin and nucleolar dynamics in porcine embryos developed in vivo (IV) and compared this physiological standard to that of embryos produced by IVF, parthenogenetic activation (PA), or SCNT. In contrast to IV embryos, chromatin spatial and temporal dynamics in PA, IVF, and SCNT embryos were altered; starting with aberrant chromatin-nuclear envelope interactions at the two-cell stage, delayed chromatin decondensation and nucleolar development at the four-cell stage, and ultimately culminating in failure of proper first lineage segregation at the blastocyst stage, demonstrated by poorly defined inner cell mass. Interestingly, in vitro produced (IVP) embryos also lacked a heterochromatin halo around nucleolar precursors, indicating imperfections in global chromatin remodeling after fertilization/activation. Porcine IV-produced zygotes and embryos display a well-synchronized pattern of chromatin dynamics compatible with genome activation and regular nucleolar formation at the four-cell stage. Production of porcine embryos under in vitro conditions by IVF, PA, or SCNT is associated with altered chromatin remodeling, delayed nucleolar formation, and poorly defined lineage segregation at the blastocyst stage, which in turn may impair their developmental capacity.

Indexed as

SwineAnimalsBlastocystCells, CulturedChromatinChromosome AberrationsCleavage Stage, OvumEmbryo, MammalianFemaleFertilization in VitroGestational AgeKineticsNuclear Transfer TechniquesParthenogenesisTime FactorsChromatin

Identifiers

PMID22468997
PMCPMC3369702
OpenAlexW1886654397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.