ArticleDrug safety2012
Promoting spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in hospitals using a hyperlink to the online reporting form: an ecological study in Portugal.
Article in Drug safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Improving adverse drug event reporting by healthcare professionals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Factors Associated with Underreporting of Adverse Drug Reactions by Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review Update.Drug safety · 2023Pooled it
- What maximizes the effectiveness and implementation of technology-based interventions to support healthcare professional practice? A systematic literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Pooled it
- How to promote adverse drug reaction reports using information systems - a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Pooled it
- The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Adverse drug reaction reporting with the Med Safety app in Uganda: a cluster-randomised, controlled trial.The Lancet. Global health · 2025Trial
- Article
- Comparative Analysis of Information Provided in German Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Sent by Physicians, Pharmacists and Consumers.Drug safety · 2023Article
- A Mobile App Leveraging Citizenship Engagement to Perform Anonymized Longitudinal Studies in the Context of COVID-19 Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring: Development and Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- UK veterinary professionals' perceptions and experiences of adverse drug reaction reporting.The Veterinary record · 2022Article
- Qualitative Study of Community Pharmacists' and General Practitioners' Views toward Pharmacovigilance in Lithuania.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health care professionals towards adverse drug reaction reporting in public sector primary health care facilities in a South African district.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Barriers to the success of an electronic pharmacovigilance reporting system in Kenya: an evaluation three years post implementation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- A comprehensive intervention for adverse drug reactions identification and reporting in a Pediatric Emergency Department.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Article
- Patient Participation and the Use of Ehealth Tools for Pharmacoviligance.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2016Review
- Promoting adverse drug reaction reporting: comparison of different approaches.Revista de saude publica · 2016Article
- A qualitative exploration of the major challenges facing pharmacovigilance in Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2015Article
- Reports of sexual disorders related to serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the French pharmacovigilance database: an example of underreporting.Drug safety · 2013Article
- Awareness among tertiary care doctors about Pharmacovigilance Programme of India: Do endocrinologists differ from others?Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting has been described as an efficient method to detect drug safety signals. However, under-reporting is a major issue undermining the effectiveness of spontaneous reports. Among hospitalized patients, ADRs are a particularly serious problem because these patients are often treated with more than one drug, and these drugs are often new and aggressive.
objectiveTo promote spontaneous ADR reporting by healthcare professionals working in hospitals in the northern regions of Portugal, we propose the inclusion of a hyperlink to an online ADR reporting form on hospitals' electronic patient records (EPRs). The main aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these hyperlinks on the number of spontaneous ADR reports to the Northern Pharmacovigilance Centre (UFN - Unidade de Farmacovigilância do Norte). We also assess the number of daily UFN website visits before and after the inclusion of the hyperlinks.
methodsAn ecological study was performed in northern Portuguese hospitals from 2006 to 2010. The hyperlinks were included in either EPRs or on computer desktops. The median of spontaneous ADR reports (total and online) per month and the respective ranges were presented before and after the intervention in all hospitals in this study. The comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test.
resultsSixteen hospital centres were involved in the study (27 hospitals). Eleven centres (18 hospitals) included the hyperlinks. Considering the hospitals with hyperlink access to the EPRs, the median ADR reports per month significantly increased, from two (range 0-12) to five reports (range 1-17). The median of ADR reports per month using the online form also increased significantly, from one (range 0-5) before the intervention to four (range 1-17) after it. Moreover, serious ADRs increased 3-fold, and non-previously described ADRs increased 4.5-fold. None of these significant increases were observed in the hospitals where the hyperlink was not installed. We also found a significant increase in daily UFN website visits, from ten before the intervention to 27 after it (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe increase in ADR reporting shows that the inclusion of hyperlinks to online ADR reporting forms is an easy and cost-effective way to change health professional behaviours with regard to spontaneous ADR reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22468615What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.