Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22468615›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2012

Promoting spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in hospitals using a hyperlink to the online reporting form: an ecological study in Portugal.

Inês Ribeiro-Vaz, Cristina Santos, Altamiro da Costa-Pereira, Ricardo Cruz-Correia

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Improving adverse drug event reporting by healthcare professionals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Inês Ribeiro-VazNorthern Pharmacovigilance Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. inesvaz@med.up.pt
Cristina Santos
Altamiro da Costa-Pereira
Ricardo Cruz-Correia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting has been described as an efficient method to detect drug safety signals. However, under-reporting is a major issue undermining the effectiveness of spontaneous reports. Among hospitalized patients, ADRs are a particularly serious problem because these patients are often treated with more than one drug, and these drugs are often new and aggressive.

objectiveTo promote spontaneous ADR reporting by healthcare professionals working in hospitals in the northern regions of Portugal, we propose the inclusion of a hyperlink to an online ADR reporting form on hospitals' electronic patient records (EPRs). The main aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these hyperlinks on the number of spontaneous ADR reports to the Northern Pharmacovigilance Centre (UFN - Unidade de Farmacovigilância do Norte). We also assess the number of daily UFN website visits before and after the inclusion of the hyperlinks.

methodsAn ecological study was performed in northern Portuguese hospitals from 2006 to 2010. The hyperlinks were included in either EPRs or on computer desktops. The median of spontaneous ADR reports (total and online) per month and the respective ranges were presented before and after the intervention in all hospitals in this study. The comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

resultsSixteen hospital centres were involved in the study (27 hospitals). Eleven centres (18 hospitals) included the hyperlinks. Considering the hospitals with hyperlink access to the EPRs, the median ADR reports per month significantly increased, from two (range 0-12) to five reports (range 1-17). The median of ADR reports per month using the online form also increased significantly, from one (range 0-5) before the intervention to four (range 1-17) after it. Moreover, serious ADRs increased 3-fold, and non-previously described ADRs increased 4.5-fold. None of these significant increases were observed in the hospitals where the hyperlink was not installed. We also found a significant increase in daily UFN website visits, from ten before the intervention to 27 after it (p < 0.001).

conclusionThe increase in ADR reporting shows that the inclusion of hyperlinks to online ADR reporting forms is an easy and cost-effective way to change health professional behaviours with regard to spontaneous ADR reports.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHealth Records, PersonalInternetAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug MonitoringElectronic Health RecordsHealth PromotionHumansMedical Record LinkagePharmacovigilancePortugalPractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality Assurance, Health Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.