Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22468181›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2012

Follow-up of intestinal metaplasia in the stomach: When, how and why.

Angelo Zullo, Cesare Hassan, Adriana Romiti, Michela Giusto, Carmine Guerriero, Roberto Lorenzetti, Salvatore Ma Campo, Silverio Tomao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Gastric intestinal metaplasia regression in United States population: A retrospective longitudinal study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Article
  7. The role of cuproptosis in gastric cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identifying the pre-malignant stomach: from guidelines to practice.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Chronic Autoimmune Gastritis: Modern Diagnostic Principles.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angelo ZulloAngelo Zullo, Cesare Hassan, Michela Giusto, Carmine Guerriero, Roberto Lorenzetti, Salvatore MA Campo, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, 00153 Rome, Italy.
Cesare Hassan
Adriana Romiti
Michela Giusto
Carmine Guerriero
Roberto Lorenzetti
Salvatore Ma Campo
Silverio Tomao
Ospedale Regina Margherita · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer remains the second most frequent cause of cancer-related mortality in the world. Screening programs in some Asian countries are impractical in the majority of other countries worldwide. Therefore, follow-up of precancerous lesions is advisable for secondary gastric cancer prevention. Intestinal metaplasia (IM) is recognized as a precancerous lesion for gastric cancer, increasing the risk by 6-fold. IM is highly prevalent in the general population, being detected in nearly 1 of every 4 patients undergoing upper endoscopy. The IM prevalence rate is significantly higher in patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, in first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients, in smokers and it increases with patient age. IM is the "breaking point" in the gastric carcinogenesis cascade and does not appear to regress following H. pylori eradication, although the cure of infection may slow its progression. Gastric cancer risk is higher in patients with incomplete-type IM, in those with both antral and gastric body involvement, and the risk significantly increases with IM extension over 20% of the gastric mucosa. Scheduled endoscopic control could be cost-effective in IM patients, depending on the yearly incidence of gastric cancer in IM patients, the stage of gastric cancer at diagnosis discovered at surveillance, and the cost of endoscopy. As a pragmatic behavior, yearly endoscopic control would appear justified in all IM patients with at least one of these conditions: (1) IM extension > 20%; (2) the presence of incomplete type IM; (3) first-degree relative of gastric cancer patients; and (4) smokers. In the remaining IM patients, a less intensive (2-3 years) could be proposed.

Indexed as

Follow-upGastric cancerIntestinal metaplasiaPreventionRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID22468181
PMCPMC3312926
OpenAlexW2158967441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.