Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22468078›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2012

Management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage: controversies and areas of uncertainty.

Eric P Trawick, Patrick S Yachimski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. When Can we Feed after a Gastrointestinal Bleed?Current gastroenterology reports · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Peptic Ulcer Is the Most Common Cause of Non-Variceal Upper-Gastrointestinal Bleeding (NVUGIB) in China.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  8. Immunosuppressive agents are associated with peptic ulcer bleeding.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. State-of-the-art management of acute bleeding peptic ulcer disease.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric P TrawickDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States. eric.p.trawick@vanderbilt.edu
Patrick S Yachimski
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND NUTRITIONT32DK007191 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RAYMOND T CHUNG · 1986 to 2026
$14.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage (UGIH) remains a common presentation requiring urgent evaluation and treatment. Accurate assessment, appropriate intervention and apt clinical skills are needed for proper management from time of presentation to discharge. The advent of pharmacologic acid suppression, endoscopic hemostatic techniques, and recognition of Helicobacter pylori as an etiologic agent in peptic ulcer disease (PUD) has revolutionized the treatment of UGIH. Despite this, acute UGIH still carries considerable rates of morbidity and mortality. This review aims to discuss current areas of uncertainty and controversy in the management of UGIH. Neoadjuvant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy has become standard empiric treatment for UGIH given that PUD is the leading cause of non-variceal UGIH, and PPIs are extremely effective at promoting ulcer healing. However, neoadjuvant PPI administration has not been shown to affect hard clinical outcomes such as rebleeding or mortality. The optimal timing of upper endoscopy in UGIH is often debated. Upon completion of volume resuscitation and hemodynamic stabilization, upper endoscopy should be performed within 24 h in all patients with evidence of UGIH for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. With rising healthcare cost paramount in today's medical landscape, the ability to appropriately triage UGIH patients is of increasing value. Upper endoscopy in conjunction with the clinical scenario allows for accurate decision making concerning early discharge home in low-risk lesions or admission for further monitoring and treatment in higher-risk lesions. Concomitant pharmacotherapy with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antiplatelet agents, such as clopidogrel, has a major impact on the etiology, severity, and potential treatment of UGIH. Long-term PPI use in patients taking chronic NSAIDs or clopidogrel is discussed thoroughly in this review.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalGastrointestinal HemorrhageHemostaticsHumansPeptic UlcerProton Pump InhibitorsUpper Gastrointestinal TractHemostaticsProton Pump InhibitorsHelicobacter pyloriHemorrhageHemostasisProkinetic agentsProton pump inhibitorsThienopyridines

Identifiers

PMID22468078
PMCPMC3309904
OpenAlexW2166716780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.