ArticleJournal of analytical atomic spectrometry2012
An interlaboratory comparison of bone lead measurements via K-shell X-ray fluorescence spectrometry: validation against inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.
Article in Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prenatal lead exposure modifies the association of maternal self-esteem with child adaptive ability.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2019Article
- Reduced bone and body mass in young male rats exposed to lead.BioMed research international · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
(109)Cd-based K-shell X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (hereafter, for brevity, XRF) is used, often in epidemiological studies, to perform non-invasive, in vivo measurements of lead in bone. We conducted the first interlaboratory study of XRF via the circulation of nine goat tibiæ in which the mean lead value ranged from 4.0 µg g(-1) to 55.3 µg g(-1) bone mineral. The test tibiæ were subsequently analyzed via nitric acid digestion followed by lead determination by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) - along with certified reference materials for bone lead - thus providing measurement traceability to SI units. Analysis of dried bone for lead via nitric acid digestion and ICP-MS yields mass fraction data in units of µg g(-1) dry weight. The mean bone lead value based on ICP-MS analysis ranged from 1.8 µg g(-1) to 35.8 µg g(-1) dry weight. For comparison purposes, XRF-measured Pb values (µg g(-1) bone mineral) were converted into the ICP-MS-measured units (µg g(-1)dry weight bone) by multiplying the former by the average ash fraction from the nine tibiæ. Eight of the XRF systems did not yield a significant bias for any of the nine tibiæ; one system was biased for one of the tibiæ; two systems were biased for two tibiæ; one system was biased for four tibiæ; two systems (813-1 and 804-2) were biased for five tibiæ and one system (801-1) was biased for six of the nine tibiæ. Average bias for the systems (under those particular operating conditions) that were biased for the majority of samples ranged from -2.6 µg g(-1) (-15.7%) to 5.1 µg g(-1) (30.7%) dry weight bone. All participants now have the ICP-MS data, allowing any corrective actions deemed necessary to be implemented. The ICP-MS data, however, indicated that the lead mass fraction varied considerably with the sampling location within the tibiæ, to the extent of exceeding XRF variability for the higher lead values. Material heterogeneity is an unavoidable reality of measuring lead in bone.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.