Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22467652›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2012

The utility and limitations of current Web-available algorithms to predict peptides recognized by CD4 T cells in response to pathogen infection.

Francisco A Chaves, Alvin H Lee, Jennifer L Nayak, Katherine A Richards, Andrea J Sant

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. T Cell Epitope Predictions.Annual review of immunology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Profiling the Targets of Protective CD8Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francisco A ChavesDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Alvin H Lee
Jennifer L Nayak
Katherine A Richards
Andrea J Sant
University of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Immunodominance in CD4 T Cell ResponsesR01AI051542 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SANT, ANDREA JANINE · 2002 to 2012
$3.6M
Translational Molecular Pediatric ResearchK12HD068373 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SCHOR, NINA F · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
Manipulation of immunodominance to promote heterosubtypic immunity to InfluenzaR21AI069372 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SANT, ANDREA JANINE · 2006 to 2007
$423k
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200700008CNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051542NIAID NIH HHS R01AI51542NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI069372NICHD NIH HHS 1K12HD068373-01NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD068373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to track CD4 T cells elicited in response to pathogen infection or vaccination is critical because of the role these cells play in protective immunity. Coupled with advances in genome sequencing of pathogenic organisms, there is considerable appeal for implementation of computer-based algorithms to predict peptides that bind to the class II molecules, forming the complex recognized by CD4 T cells. Despite recent progress in this area, there is a paucity of data regarding the success of these algorithms in identifying actual pathogen-derived epitopes. In this study, we sought to rigorously evaluate the performance of multiple Web-available algorithms by comparing their predictions with our results--obtained by purely empirical methods for epitope discovery in influenza that used overlapping peptides and cytokine ELISPOTs--for three independent class II molecules. We analyzed the data in different ways, trying to anticipate how an investigator might use these computational tools for epitope discovery. We come to the conclusion that currently available algorithms can indeed facilitate epitope discovery, but all shared a high degree of false-positive and false-negative predictions. Therefore, efficiencies were low. We also found dramatic disparities among algorithms and between predicted IC(50) values and true dissociation rates of peptide-MHC class II complexes. We suggest that improved success of predictive algorithms will depend less on changes in computational methods or increased data sets and more on changes in parameters used to "train" the algorithms that factor in elements of T cell repertoire and peptide acquisition by class II molecules.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationInternetAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansInfectionsMiceMice, TransgenicPeptidesSequence Analysis, DNAEpitopesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIPeptides

Identifiers

PMID22467652
PMCPMC3331894
OpenAlexW2107019239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.