Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22467291›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2012

Impact of occupational carcinogens on lung cancer risk in a general population.

Sara De Matteis, Dario Consonni, Jay H Lubin, Margaret Tucker, Susan Peters, Roel Ch Vermeulen, Hans Kromhout, Pier Alberto Bertazzi, Neil E Caporaso, Angela C Pesatori and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lung Cancer Screening and Prevention: Beyond Conventional Strategies in a Rapidly Changing Global Milieu.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Multicenter Study to Assess a Systematic Screening of Occupational Exposures in Lung Cancer Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sara De MatteisUnit of Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and EPOCA Research Centre, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Dario Consonni
Jay H Lubin
Margaret Tucker
Susan Peters
Roel Ch Vermeulen
Hans Kromhout
Pier Alberto Bertazzi
Neil E Caporaso
Angela C Pesatori
Sholom Wacholder
Maria Teresa Landi
Ospedale Maggiore · ITUtrecht University · NLNational Cancer Institute · USFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

STRUCTURE AND STABILIZATION OF THE BACTERIAL NUCLEOIDZ01DK036120 · NIDDK · DIABETES, DIGESTIVE, KIDNEY DISEASES · PI ZIMMERMAN, STEVEN C. · 1998 to 2005
–
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to occupational carcinogens is an important preventable cause of lung cancer. Most of the previous studies were in highly exposed industrial cohorts. Our aim was to quantify lung cancer burden attributable to occupational carcinogens in a general population.

methodsWe applied a new job-exposure matrix (JEM) to translate lifetime work histories, collected by personal interview and coded into standard job titles, into never, low and high exposure levels for six known/suspected occupational lung carcinogens in the Environment and Genetics in Lung cancer Etiology (EAGLE) population-based case-control study, conducted in Lombardy region, Italy, in 2002-05. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in men (1537 cases and 1617 controls), by logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders, including smoking and co-exposure to JEM carcinogens. The population attributable fraction (PAF) was estimated as impact measure.

resultsMen showed an increased lung cancer risk even at low exposure to asbestos (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.42-2.18), crystalline silica (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.00-1.71) and nickel-chromium (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.90-1.53); risk increased with exposure level. For polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, an increased risk (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.99-2.70) was found only for high exposures. The PAFs for any exposure to asbestos, silica and nickel-chromium were 18.1, 5.7 and 7.0%, respectively, equivalent to an overall PAF of 22.5% (95% CI: 14.1-30.0). This corresponds to about 1016 (95% CI: 637-1355) male lung cancer cases/year in Lombardy.

conclusionsThese findings support the substantial role of selected occupational carcinogens on lung cancer burden, even at low exposures, in a general population.

Indexed as

AgedAir Pollutants, OccupationalCarcinogensEducational StatusFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthOccupationsRisk AssessmentSex FactorsSmokingTime FactorsAir Pollutants, OccupationalCarcinogens

Identifiers

PMID22467291
PMCPMC3396321
OpenAlexW2144356804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.