Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22467225›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2012

Radon testing and mitigation: an intervention in a primary care setting.

Mary Jo Nissen, Joseph W Leach, Julia A Nissen, Karen K Swenson, Heather Kehn

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Radon and Tobacco Risk Counseling During Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Home Radon Testing in Rural Appalachia.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary Jo NissenOncology Research Department, Park Nicollet Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Nissem@parknicollet.com
Joseph W Leach
Julia A Nissen
Karen K Swenson
Heather Kehn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer and it is recommended that all homes be tested for radon. Written surveys completed by 692 patients at two primary care clinics in the Minneapolis, MN, area revealed that only 24.7 % had ever tested their home. Testing rate was higher with greater income and education level and in homes without someone who smokes. Of participants whose homes had not been tested, 250 were enrolled in an intervention that included printed information on radon, a coupon for a discounted testing kit, and encouragement by their primary care provider to test. Follow-up indicated minimal effect of this intervention, with only 14.4 % of these participants testing during the ensuing year. Future studies should assess a stronger intervention, perhaps over multiple visits, and providing test kits on site. Targeting patients who smoke may be an effective use of resources.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAir Pollutants, RadioactiveAir Pollution, IndoorEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMinnesotaPatient Education as TopicPrimary Health CareRadonSex FactorsAir Pollutants, RadioactiveRadon

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.