Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22466874›Full record

GuidelineLa Radiologia medica2012

Clinical indications for cardiac computed tomography. From the Working Group of the Cardiac Radiology Section of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM).

E di Cesare, I Carbone, A Carriero, M Centonze, F De Cobelli, R De Rosa, P Di Renzi, A Esposito, R Faletti, R Fattori and 13 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in La Radiologia medica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. TAVI imaging: over the echocardiography.La Radiologia medica · 2020
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

E di CesareDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Università di L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
I Carbone
A Carriero
M Centonze
F De Cobelli
R De Rosa
P Di Renzi
A Esposito
R Faletti
R Fattori
M Francone
A Giovagnoni
L La Grutta
G Ligabue
L Lovato
R Marano
M Midiri
L Natale
A Romagnoli
V Russo
F Sardanelli
F Cademartiri
Working Group of the Cardiac Radiology Section of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) has grown as a useful means in different clinical contexts. Technological development has progressively extended the indications for CCT while reducing the required radiation dose. Even today there is little documentation from the main international scientific societies describing the proper use and clinical indications of CCT; in particular, there are no complete guidelines. This document reflects the position of the Working Group of the Cardiac Radiology Section of the Italian Society of Radiology concerning the indications for CCT.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHumansItalyRadiation DosageTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.