SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2012
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Prospective Evidence.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Single-incision laparoscopic versus traditional multiport laparoscopic colorectal surgery--a cumulative meta-analysis and systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2013Pooled it
- Feasibility of needlescopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safety and learning curve for Japanese Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System-unqualified young surgeons.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Laparoscopy for Benign Diseases of the Colon.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2017Review
- A case of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for a bleeding Meckel's diverticulum diagnosed pre-operatively by double-balloon endoscopy.International journal of surgery case reports · 2017Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic ileocecal resection using an organ retractor.International journal of surgery case reports · 2017Article
- Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multi-incision laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: a propensity-score-matched analysis of 214 cases.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Review of 500 single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases - Lessons learned.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Review of single incision laparoscopic surgery in colorectal surgery.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
- Single-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery shows equivalent or better outcomes to standard laparoscopic surgery: results of a 190-patient, 7-criterion case-match study.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Article
- Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for a tumor-specific mesorectal excision in patients with colorectal cancer: initial experience with 20 consecutive cases.Annals of coloproctology · 2015Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy--results of a matched-pair comparison to conventional surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2015Article
- New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: state of art.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from 224 colonic resections performed at a single center using SILS.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) was developed as a novel minimally invasive surgical approach.
aimsThe aim of this meta-analysis was to compare SILS and conventional laparoscopy (CL) for colorectal diseases with respect to perioperative and oncologic outcomes.
methodsAn electronic search was performed to retrieve all relevant articles published in the English language between 2008 and 2012 comparing SILS and CL for colorectal diseases. The data were analyzed with fixed-effect or random-effects models using review manager version 5.0.
resultsA total of 14 studies (one randomized controlled trial and 13 nonrandomized controlled trials) were found to be eligible and reported on 1,155 subjects, of whom 521 underwent SILS and 634 underwent CL for colorectal diseases. Concerning the perioperative outcomes, no differences were observed in conversion rate, operating time, and postoperative adverse events; however, patients who underwent SILS had lower blood loss, decreased blood transfusion requirement, shorter time to flatus, shorter hospital stay, and smaller incision. Concerning the oncologic outcomes, length of resected specimens, number of harvested lymph nodes, proximal margin, and distal margin, were comparable between two groups.
conclusionsSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a safe, feasible, and oncological efficient alternative to CL for colorectal diseases. Further larger, multi-centred, randomised controlled trial is indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22466079What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.