Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22465672›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2012

Role of arginine 293 and glutamine 288 in communication between catalytic and allosteric sites in yeast ribonucleotide reductase.

Md Faiz Ahmad, Prem Singh Kaushal, Qun Wan, Sanath R Wijerathna, Xiuxiang An, Mingxia Huang, Chris Godfrey Dealwis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Potent competitive inhibition of human ribonucleotide reductase by a nonnucleoside small molecule.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The structural basis for the allosteric regulation of ribonucleotide reductase.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Md Faiz AhmadDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Prem Singh Kaushal
Qun Wan
Sanath R Wijerathna
Xiuxiang An
Mingxia Huang
Chris Godfrey Dealwis
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Structure-Function and Inhibition of Rnr1R01CA100827 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI DEALWIS, CHRIS G · 2003 to 2011
$2.5M
In Vivo Regulation and Inhibition of Ribonucleotide ReductaseR01CA125574 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HUANG, MINGXIA · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS 2R01CA100827-04A1NCI NIH HHS 3R01CA100827-07S1NCI NIH HHS CA125574NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100827NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ribonucleotide reductases (RRs) catalyze the rate-limiting step of de novo deoxynucleotide (dNTP) synthesis. Eukaryotic RRs consist of two proteins, RR1 (α) that contains the catalytic site and RR2 (β) that houses a diferric-tyrosyl radical essential for ribonucleoside diphosphate reduction. Biochemical analysis has been combined with isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), X-ray crystallography and yeast genetics to elucidate the roles of two loop 2 mutations R293A and Q288A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae RR1 (ScRR1). These mutations, R293A and Q288A, cause lethality and severe S phase defects, respectively, in cells that use ScRR1 as the sole source of RR1 activity. Compared to the wild-type enzyme activity, R293A and Q288A mutants show 4% and 15%, respectively, for ADP reduction, whereas they are 20% and 23%, respectively, for CDP reduction. ITC data showed that R293A ScRR1 is unable to bind ADP and binds CDP with 2-fold lower affinity compared to wild-type ScRR1. With the Q288A ScRR1 mutant, there is a 6-fold loss of affinity for ADP binding and a 2-fold loss of affinity for CDP compared to the wild type. X-ray structures of R293A ScRR1 complexed with dGTP and AMPPNP-CDP [AMPPNP, adenosine 5-(β,γ-imido)triphosphate tetralithium salt] reveal that ADP is not bound at the catalytic site, and CDP binds farther from the catalytic site compared to wild type. Our in vivo functional analyses demonstrated that R293A cannot support mitotic growth, whereas Q288A can, albeit with a severe S phase defect. Taken together, our structure, activity, ITC and in vivo data reveal that the arginine 293 and glutamine 288 residues of ScRR1 are crucial in facilitating ADP and CDP substrate selection.

Indexed as

Adenosine DiphosphateAllosteric SiteArginineCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayCytidine DiphosphateGlutamineModels, MolecularMutationProtein BindingRibonucleotide ReductasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSubstrate SpecificityAdenosine DiphosphateArginineCytidine DiphosphateGlutamineRibonucleotide ReductasesRnr1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22465672
PMCPMC3589814
OpenAlexW1995921890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.