Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22465439›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience2012

Animal models of eating disorders.

S F Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessing Activity-based Anorexia in Mice.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

S F KimCenter for Neurobiology and Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, The Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania, 125 S 31st St., TRL Rm 2207, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. sangwonk@mail.med.upenn.edu
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Molecular basis of atypical antipsychotic drugs-induced weight gainR01DK084336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KIM, SANGWON F · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Dextras1, Brain Iron Homeostasis and Mental HealthR00MH079614 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KIM, SANGWON F · 2008 to 2010
$793k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK084336NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK084336NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH079614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feeding is a fundamental process for basic survival and is influenced by genetics and environmental stressors. Recent advances in our understanding of behavioral genetics have provided a profound insight on several components regulating eating patterns. However, our understanding of eating disorders, such as anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating, is still poor. The animal model is an essential tool in the investigation of eating behaviors and their pathological forms, yet development of an appropriate animal model for eating disorders still remains challenging due to our limited knowledge and some of the more ambiguous clinical diagnostic measures. Therefore, this review will serve to focus on the basic clinical features of eating disorders and the current advances in animal models of eating disorders.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaBulimia NervosaDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsBinge-Eating DisorderHumans

Identifiers

PMID22465439
PMCPMC3351502
OpenAlexW2067890660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.