ArticleVaccine2012
Induction of mucosal HIV-specific B and T cell responses after oral immunization with live coxsackievirus B4 recombinants.
Article in Vaccine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The development of HIV vaccines targeting gp41 membrane-proximal external region (MPER): challenges and prospects.Protein & cell · 2018Review
- Transcriptional dysregulation of inflammatory/immune pathways after active vaccination against Huntington's disease.Human molecular genetics · 2015Article
- Development of replication-competent viral vectors for HIV vaccine delivery.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Given the limited success of clinical HIV vaccine trials, new vaccine strategies are needed for the HIV pipeline. The present study explored the novel concept that a live enteric virus, with limited disease potential, is a suitable vaccine vector to elicit HIV-specific immune responses in the gut mucosa of immunized mice. Two coxsackievirus B4 (CVB4) vaccine vectors were designed to induce HIV-specific B or T cell responses. A B cell immunogen, CVB4/gp41(2F5), was constructed by expressing an epitope from the membrane proximal external region (MPER) of gp41 as a structural peptide within a surface loop of a capsid protein of CVB4. The T cell immunogen, CVB4/p24(73(3)), was constructed previously by expressing a gag p24 sequence as a non-structural peptide at the amino-terminus of the CVB4 polyprotein. The CVB4/gp41(2F5) recombinant was antigenic in mice and elicited anti-gp41 antibodies in both the mucosal and systemic compartments. The route of immunization affected the antibody response since oral delivery of CVB4/gp41(2F5) induced anti-gp41 antibodies in the mucosal but not in the systemic compartment while parenteral delivery induced anti-gp41 antibodies in both compartments. In contrast, oral immunization with CVB4/p24(73(3)) elicited both mucosal and systemic gag p24-specific T cell responses. Since coxsackieviruses are ubiquitous in the human population, a key question is whether pre-existing vector immunity will inhibit the ability of a CVB4-based vaccine to induce HIV-specific immune responses. We show that pre-existing vector immunity did not preclude the development of mucosal anti-gp41 antibodies or gag p24-specific T cell responses after oral immunization with the CVB4/HIV recombinants. We suggest that the CVB4/HIV recombinants have the potential to be a viable vaccine product because of ease of delivery, safety, immunogenicity, ease of large-scale production, and storage conditions requiring cold-chain temperatures provided by refrigeration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.