Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22463705›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2012

Determination of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with COPD: a comparison of different assays.

José L López-Campos, Elena Arellano, Carmen Calero, Ana Delgado, Eduardo Márquez, Pilar Cejudo, Francisco Ortega, Francisco Rodríguez-Panadero, Ana Montes-Worboys

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multi-omics to study chronic respiratory diseases and viral infections.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

José L López-CamposUnidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain. lcampos@separ.es
Elena Arellano
Carmen Calero
Ana Delgado
Eduardo Márquez
Pilar Cejudo
Francisco Ortega
Francisco Rodríguez-Panadero
Ana Montes-Worboys
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an inflammatory pulmonary disorder with systemic inflammatory manifestations that are mediated by circulating acute-phase reactants. This study compared an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to a nephelometric technique for the measurement of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) and investigated how the choice of assay influenced the estimation of inflammation in patients with stable COPD.

methodsCRP and SAA concentrations measured by ELISA and nephelometry in 88 patients with COPD and 45 control subjects were used to evaluate the performance of these methods in a clinical setting.

resultsWith both assays, the concentrations of CRP and SAA were higher in COPD patients than in controls after adjustment for age and sex. There was a moderate correlation between the values measured by ELISA and those measured by nephelometry (logCRP: r = 0.55, p < 0.001; logSAA: r = 0.40, p < 0.001). However, the concentrations of biomarkers determined by nephelometry were significantly higher than those obtained with ELISA for CRP (mean difference = 2.7 (9.4) mg/L) and SAA (mean difference = 0.31 (14.3) mg/L).

conclusionAlthough the serum CRP and SAA concentrations measured by ELISA and nephelometry correlated well in COPD patients, the ELISA values tended to be lower for CRP and SAA when compared with nephelometric measurements. International standardization of commercial kits is required before the predictive validity of inflammatory markers for patients with COPD can be effectively assessed in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Acute-Phase ProteinsAgedBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesC-Reactive ProteinCross-Sectional StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayExhalationFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNephelometry and TurbidimetryPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSerum Amyloid A ProteinAcute-Phase ProteinsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinSerum Amyloid A Protein

Identifiers

PMID22463705
PMCPMC3340310
OpenAlexW1963943986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.