Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22462794›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2012

Using cadence to study free-living ambulatory behaviour.

Catrine Tudor-Locke, David A Rowe

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02650258 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Cadence and Intensity Across the Adult Lifespan

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Massachusetts, AmherstRan2015 to 2019Enrolled260ConditionsAging, Walking, Motor Activity, Activities of Daily LivingArmstreadmill walking
NCT03722797 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Metabolic Cost and Physical Activity in Sedentary Adults With a Unilateral Transtibial Amputation as Compared to Controls

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of DelawareRan2017 to 2022Enrolled3ConditionsAmputeesArmsMetabolic Cost Testing Procedures
NCT03940937 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Cadence and Intensity in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Massachusetts, AmherstRan2019 to 2019Enrolled20ConditionsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Walking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Music Tempo: A Tool for Regulating Walking Cadence and Physical Activity Intensity in Overweight Adults?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Associations of neighbourhood walkability with patterns of device-measured stepping, standing and sitting.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catrine Tudor-LockeWalking Behavior Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA. Tudor-Locke@pbrc.edu
David A Rowe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health benefits of a physically active lifestyle across a person's lifespan have been established. If there is any single physical activity behaviour that we should measure well and promote effectively, it is ambulatory activity and, more specifically, walking. Since public health physical activity guidelines include statements related to intensity of activity, it follows that we need to measure and promote free-living patterns of ambulatory activity that are congruent with this intent. The purpose of this review article is to present and summarize the potential for using cadence (steps/minute) to represent such behavioural patterns of ambulatory activity in free-living. Cadence is one of the spatio-temporal parameters of gait or walking speed. It is typically assessed using short-distance walks in clinical research and practice, but free-living cadence can be captured with a number of commercially available accelerometers that possess time-stamping technology. This presents a unique opportunity to use the same metric to communicate both ambulatory performance (assessed under testing conditions) and behaviour (assessed in the real world). Ranges for normal walking cadence assessed under laboratory conditions are 96-138 steps/minute for women and 81-135 steps/minute for men across their lifespan. The correlation between mean cadence and intensity (assessed with indirect calorimetry and expressed as metabolic equivalents [METs]) based on five treadmill/overground walking studies, is r = 0.93 and 100 steps/minute is considered to be a reasonable heuristic value indicative of walking at least at absolutely-defined moderate intensity (i.e. minimally, 3 METs) in adults. The weighted mean cadence derived from eight studies that have observed pedestrian cadence under natural conditions was 115.2 steps/minute, demonstrating that achieving 100 steps/minute is realistic in specific settings that occur in real life. However, accelerometer data collected in a large, representative sample suggest that self-selected walking at a cadence equivalent to ≥100 steps/minute is a rare occurrence in free-living adults. Specifically, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data show that US adults spent ≅4.8 hours/day in non-movement (i.e. zero cadence) during wearing time, ≅8.7 hours at 1-59 steps/minute, ≅16 minutes/day at cadences of 60-79 steps/minute, ≅8 minutes at 80-99 steps/minute, ≅5 minutes at 100-119 steps/minute, and ≅2 minutes at 120+ steps/minute. Cadence appears to be sensitive to change with intervention, and capitalizing on the natural tempo of music is an obvious means of targeting cadence. Cadence could potentially be used effectively in epidemiological study, intervention and behavioural research, dose-response studies, determinants studies and in prescription and practice. It is easily interpretable by researchers, clinicians, programme staff and the lay public, and therefore offers the potential to bridge science, practice and real life.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorLife StylePublic HealthExercise TestHumansMetabolic EquivalentMonitoring, AmbulatoryWalking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.