Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22462654›Full record

Trial reportActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2012

Prognostic value of Bcl-2 in two independent populations of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Mathilde S Larsen, Karsten Bjerre, Anita Giobbie-Hurder, Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm, Katrine L Henriksen, Bent Ejlertsen, Anne E Lykkesfeldt, Birgitte B Rasmussen

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. BCL-2 and BCL-xL in Cancer: Regulation, Function, and Therapeutic Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathilde S LarsenHerlev Hospital, Department of Pathology, Denmark. maskla01@heh.regionh.dk
Karsten Bjerre
Anita Giobbie-Hurder
Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm
Katrine L Henriksen
Bent Ejlertsen
Anne E Lykkesfeldt
Birgitte B Rasmussen
Danish Cancer Society · DKHerlev Hospital · DKDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDanish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group · DKRigshospitalet · DKSlagelse Hospital · DK

Funding

IBCSG STATISTICAL CENTER--A BREAST CANCER STUDY RESOURCEU24CA075362 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI REGAN, MEREDITH M · 1997 to 2015
$7.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA-75362NCI NIH HHS U24 CA075362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEstrogen receptor (ER) status is not an optimal marker for response to adjuvant endocrine therapy since approximately 30% of patients with ER-positive tumors eventually relapse. Bcl-2 is regulated by ER and may thus be considered as an indicator of ER activity and a candidate supplementary marker to ER status. PATIENTS AND

methodsTumor tissue from 257 patients with ER-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen was used for determination of the best threshold for immunohistochemical Bcl-2 assessment as prognostic marker. Subsequently, samples from the Danish patients of the randomized clinical trial BIG 1-98 comprising 1191 ER-positive patients treated with tamoxifen, letrozole or a sequence of the two were immunohistochemically stained for Bcl-2 to further explore the prognostic value of Bcl-2.

resultsTwo Bcl-2 levels were found to divide the population of the primary study into significantly different groups according to disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariate analysis confirmed the significance of the lowest level, and showed Bcl-2 to be an independent prognostic marker. Analysis of the Danish cohort of the BIG 1-98 confirmed that Bcl-2 was a significant predictor of DFS, independent of known prognostic markers. However, in an additional analysis of a subset of the Danish cohort of BIG 1-98 including only HER-2 normal patients, the effect of Bcl-2 was not statistically significant. DISCUSSION: Low Bcl-2 can predict poor outcome of patients with ER-positive tumors treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy, whereas the use of Bcl-2 for determination of addition of chemotherapy was not supported by this study.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastChemotherapy, AdjuvantDouble-Blind MethodErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Receptors, EstrogenRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Receptors, EstrogenTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID22462654
PMCPMC3744229
OpenAlexW2127487694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.