ArticleDrugs & aging2012
Quality measures for medication continuity in long-term care facilities, using a structured panel process.
Article in Drugs & aging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methodological evaluation of the psychometric properties of medication-related quality indicators in residential aged care homes: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026Pooled it
- Nursing-sensitive quality indicators for quality improvement in Norwegian nursing homes - a modified Delphi study.BMC health services research · 2023Review
- Development of Quality Indicators to Evaluate the Appropriateness of Empiric Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Patients.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2023Article
- An Environmental Scan of Ambulatory Care Quality Indicators for Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease Currently Used in Canada.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2021Article
- An Environmental Scan and Evaluation of Quality Indicators Across Canadian Kidney Transplant Centers.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2021Article
- An Environmental Scan of Canadian Quality Metrics for Patients on In-Center Hemodialysis.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020Article
- Development and Validation of Nine Deprescribing Algorithms for Patients on Hemodialysis to Decrease Polypharmacy.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020Article
- An Environmental Scan and Evaluation of Home Dialysis Quality Indicators Currently Used in Canada.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020Article
- Feasibility of a hemodialysis safety checklist for nurses and patients: a quality improvement study.Clinical kidney journal · 2016Article
- Observational
- Development of a hemodialysis safety checklist using a structured panel process.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2015Article
- Defining quality outcomes for complex-care patients transitioning across the continuum using a structured panel process.BMJ quality & safety · 2013Review
- Discontinuation of anticoagulant care during admission to a psychiatric hospital.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient transitions, such as transfers between acute and long-term care (LTC), aposare times when the likelihood of communication failure between healthcare providers is increased. Employing appropriate health quality indicators helps support improvement efforts. To date, few quality indicators that evaluate the continuity of medication use between acute and LTC facilities have been described.
objectiveThe aim of the study was to develop quality indicators signalling the potential discontinuation of previously prescribed medications for chronic diseases when residents return to LTC following an acute-care hospitalization.
methodsA literature review for the selection of potential indicators was conducted, followed by a three-step process: (i) initial screening round that rated the indicators; (ii) a 1-day in-person consensus meeting in which the panel refined the parameters regarding the proposed quality indicators; and (iii) a final anonymous survey that assessed consensus among panel members. The study setting was a survey and consensus meeting with national representation, held in Toronto, ON, Canada. A ten-member expert panel with broad geographical and clinical representation participated and was made up of registered nurses, physicians, pharmacists, policy makers and academic researchers. A 75% agreement threshold was required for consensus, as measured on a 9-point Likert-type scale. The panel evaluated quality indicators for effectiveness, relevance and feasibility, using currently available healthcare administrative data.
resultsThe panel reached consensus on four quality indicators to assess the unintentional discontinuation of medications prescribed to LTC residents for chronic diseases upon return to LTC after an acute-care admission. The selected indicators were (i) HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for all indications; (ii) anticoagulants (e.g. warfarin) for the indication of atrial fibrillation; (iii) proton-pump inhibitors for the indication of post-gastrointestinal haemorrhage; and (iv) thyroxine for all indications. The panel identified three additional treatment groups for future consideration as quality indicators: anti-Parkinson's disease, anti-diabetes and antidepressant medications.
conclusionA novel set of quality indicators has been developed to evaluate medication continuity between acute and LTC facilities. The adoption and implementation of these indicators in clinical practice can help inform quality improvement efforts at various local and regional levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22462630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.