Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22462545›Full record

ArticleAnnual review of neuroscience2012

Attractor dynamics of spatially correlated neural activity in the limbic system.

James J Knierim, Kechen Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual review of neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Path integration in complex number space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Learning of visual sequences by neurons in the human hippocampus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Bayesian inference in ring attractor networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Attractor-like Dynamics in the Subicular Complex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James J KnierimKrieger Mind/Brain Institute and Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA. jknierim@jhu.edu
Kechen Zhang
Johns Hopkins University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · US

Funding

MULTI-SITE ANALYSIS OF HIPPOCAMPAL NEURONAL ENSEMBLESR01NS039456 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI JAMES J KNIERIM · 2000 to 2026
$9.1M
CRCNS: Path Intergration by the Grid Cell NetworkR01MH079511 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BLAIR, HUGH T, KNIERIM, JAMES J · 2006 to 2015
$3.0M
NIMH NIH HHS MH079511NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079511NINDS NIH HHS NS039456NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attractor networks are a popular computational construct used to model different brain systems. These networks allow elegant computations that are thought to represent a number of aspects of brain function. Although there is good reason to believe that the brain displays attractor dynamics, it has proven difficult to test experimentally whether any particular attractor architecture resides in any particular brain circuit. We review models and experimental evidence for three systems in the rat brain that are presumed to be components of the rat's navigational and memory system. Head-direction cells have been modeled as a ring attractor, grid cells as a plane attractor, and place cells both as a plane attractor and as a point attractor. Whereas the models have proven to be extremely useful conceptual tools, the experimental evidence in their favor, although intriguing, is still mostly circumstantial.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBrainLimbic SystemNonlinear Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID22462545
PMCPMC5613981
OpenAlexW2164012213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.