Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22461799›Full record

ArticleClinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases2011

New biomaterials for bone regeneration.

Fabrizio Matassi, Lorenzo Nistri, Diana Chicon Paez, Massimo Innocenti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Calcium silicate as a graft material for bone fractures: a systematic review.The Journal of international medical research · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Natural Cryoprotectant Honey for Fertility Cryopreservation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Scaffolds for Use in Craniofacial Bone Regeneration.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabrizio MatassiUniversity of Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo Nistri
Diana Chicon Paez
Massimo Innocenti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone-grafting techniques either with autografts or allografts still represent a challenge for reconstructive surgery.Allografts and autografts are the current strategies for filling bone defects and subsequent repair but each have drawbacks. Synthetic bone-graft substitutes, developed in an effort to overcome the inherent limitations of autograft and allograft, represent an alternative strategy. Synthetic bone graft substitutes have the goal of mimicking the physical and mechanical nature of native tissue and to promote osteoconduction for bone regeneration. In addition these substitutes are capable to release drugs or growth factors in a temporally and spatially manner. Some biomaterials are employed to design biomimetic scaffold such as natural and synthetic polymers, ceramics, metallics and composites.The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the main biomaterials used for bone reconstruction.

Indexed as

biomaterialsregenerative medicine.scaffoldtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID22461799
PMCPMC3230919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.