ArticleClinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases2007
Bone mass pharmacogenetics and ethnic health implications.
Article in Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between dietary fiber intake and bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.European journal of nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Genetics of the bone response to bisphosphonate treatments.Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a common skeletal disease with a strong genetic component characterized by reduced bone mass and increased risk of fragility fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) is considered the best established risk factor for osteoporotic fractures.Over the last years a large number of studies have pointed to the variability in many target genes and their relation with BMD and other determinants of fracture risk such as ultrasound bone properties, skeletal geometry and bone turnover markers. The importance of genetic factors in the bone quality is substantial, but no consensus exists yet on the genes that are involved.Although osteoporosis is world healthy problem, there are many differences in human ethnics regarding both disease morbidity and drug treatment efficacy. Heterogeneity in drug response may reflect varying responsiveness to osteoporosis treatments due to allele variation in signaling pathway genes such as vitamin D receptor (VDR) or estrogen receptor α (ERα). Polymorphisms of VDR and ERαloci appear genetic determinants of their corresponding hormonal treatment response such as vitamin D and estrogens. Because of their specific ethnic distribution, polymorphisms of VDR and ERαgenes may be involved in reported human differences of osteoporosis treatment responses.Knowledge of the molecular and functional consequences of the gene polymorphisms is crucial to fully appreciate their significance and understand their potential clinical implications. Future studies and preventive strategies to management osteoporosis need to take in account these genetic factors.
Identifiers
22461213PMC2781242What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.