ArticleAnnals of dyslexia2012
An interaction-dominant perspective on reading fluency and dyslexia.
Article in Annals of dyslexia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- A time-series perspective on executive functioning: The benefits of a dynamic approach to random number generation.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2023Article
- A genome-wide association study identifies a new variant associated with word reading fluency in Chinese children.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2023Article
- The nonlinearity of pupil diameter fluctuations in an insight task as criteria for detecting children who solve the problem from those who do not.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Four Methods to Distinguish between Fractal Dimensions in Time Series through Recurrence Quantification Analysis.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Using measures of reading time regularity (RTR) to quantify eye movement dynamics, and how they are shaped by linguistic information.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Changes in the Complexity of Limb Movements during the First Year of Life across Different Tasks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Early Warning Signals in Phase Space: Geometric Resilience Loss Indicators From Multiplex Cumulative Recurrence Networks.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Domain-General Learning and Memory Substrates of Reading Acquisition.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2020Article
- Finding Structure in Time: Visualizing and Analyzing Behavioral Time Series.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- The Link between Microdevelopment and Long-Term Learning Trajectories in Science Learning.Human development · 2019Article
- Handwriting movements for assessment of motor symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and bipolar disorder.PloS one · 2019Article
- Dyslexie font does not benefit reading in children with or without dyslexia.Annals of dyslexia · 2018Article
- Word Naming in the L1 and L2: A Dynamic Perspective on Automatization and the Degree of Semantic Involvement in Naming.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Silent Reading Fluency and Comprehension in Bilingual Children.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Article
- Asymmetric Dynamic Attunement of Speech and Gestures in the Construction of Children's Understanding.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Article
- Complex Adaptive Behavior and Dexterous Action.Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences · 2015Review
- Making sense of the noise: Replication difficulties of Correll's (2008) modulation of 1/f noise in a racial bias task.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2015Article
- Article
- Reaction time variability associated with reading skills in poor readers with ADHD.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2014Article
- Embodiment of intersubjective time: relational dynamics as attractors in the temporal coordination of interpersonal behaviors and experiences.Frontiers in psychology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The background noise of response times is often overlooked in scientific inquiries of cognitive performances. However, it is becoming widely acknowledged in psychology, medicine, physiology, physics, and beyond that temporal patterns of variability constitute a rich source of information. Here, we introduce two complexity measures (1/f scaling and recurrence quantification analysis) that employ background noise as metrics of reading fluency. These measures gauge the extent of interdependence across, rather than within, cognitive components. In this study, we investigated dyslexic and non-dyslexic word-naming performance in beginning readers and observed that these complexity metrics differentiate reliably between dyslexic and average response times and correlate strongly with the severity of the reading impairment. The direction of change in the introduced metrics suggests that developmental dyslexia resides from dynamical instabilities in the coordination among the many components necessary to read, which could explain why dyslexic readers score below average on so many distinct tasks and modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.