Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22460565›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2012

A physician order category-based clinical guideline comparison system.

Hwan-Jeu Yu, Chia-Ping Shen, Sarangerel Dorjgochoo, Chi-Huang Chen, Jin-Ming Wu, Mei-Shu Lai, Ching-Ting Tan, Chinburen Jigjidsuren, Erdenebaatar Altangerel, Hung-Chang Lee and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hwan-Jeu YuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Ping Shen
Sarangerel Dorjgochoo
Chi-Huang Chen
Jin-Ming Wu
Mei-Shu Lai
Ching-Ting Tan
Chinburen Jigjidsuren
Erdenebaatar Altangerel
Hung-Chang Lee
Chih-Wen Hsueh
Yufang Chung
Feipei Lai

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, in order to provide high-quality medical services and to extend resources and reduce costs, many large hospitals have adopted clinical guidelines as a structured way to manage medical activities. However, customization of clinical guidelines in order to treat a large number of patients is a major challenge. In this paper, we present a physician order category-based clinical guideline comparison system. The system uses a preprocessor software to convert the clinical guidelines from a Microsoft Word document into XML format, and it can also compare clinical guidelines over the conceptual view such as the physician order category. The system has already been used to compare the HCC surgical clinical guidelines of Taiwan and Mongolia-resulting in some differences being found, for which possible causes were discussed. Therefore, it can be seen that our research provides a practical and convenient way in which to compare clinical guidelines based on physician order category-thereby saving time and enabling physicians to quickly resolve discrepancies and make necessary adjustments to clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalMedical Order Entry SystemsPractice Guidelines as TopicComputer SystemsHumansProgramming LanguagesQuality Assurance, Health CareSoftware Design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.