Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22460359›Full record

ReviewPediatric cardiology2012

Cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5 mutations and cardiac arrhythmia.

Weihua Song, Weinian Shou

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A novel gain-of-function mutationAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Hypernatremia and intercalated disc edema synergistically exacerbate long-QT syndrome type 3 phenotype.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weihua SongDepartment of Pediatrics, Riley Heart Research Center, Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1044 West Walnut Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Weinian Shou
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Molecular Pathway in Myocardium DevelopmentR01HL081092 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHOU, WEINIAN · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL081092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a major cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel isoform in the heart, the Nav1.5 channel is essential for cardiac action potential initiation and subsequent propagation throughout the heart. Mutations of Nav1.5 have been linked to a variety of cardiac diseases such as long QT syndrome (LQTs), Brugada syndrome, cardiac conduction defect, atrial fibrillation, and dilated cardiomyopathy. The mutagenesis approach and heterologous expression systems are most frequently used to study the function of this channel. This review focuses primarily on recent findings of Nav1.5 mutations associated with type 3 long QT syndrome (LQT3) in particular. Understanding the functional changes of the Nav1.5 mutation may offer critical insight into the mechanism of long QT3 syndrome. In addition, this review provides the updated information on the current progress of using various experimental model systems to study primarily the long QT3 syndrome.

Indexed as

AnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacCardiac Conduction System DiseaseHeartHumansLong QT SyndromeMiceMutationNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelSCN5A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22460359
PMCPMC3393812
OpenAlexW1996735711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.