Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22460123›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2012

Inhibiting the breakdown of endogenous opioids and cannabinoids to alleviate pain.

Bernard P Roques, Marie-Claude Fournié-Zaluski, Michel Wurm

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Genes · 2023
    Review
  11. Chemically Fueled Communication Along a Scaffolded Nanoscale Array of Squaramides.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernard P RoquesPharmaleads SAS, 11 Rue Watt, 75013 Paris, France. bernard.roques@pharmaleads.com
Marie-Claude Fournié-Zaluski
Michel Wurm

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain remains unsatisfactorily treated, and few novel painkillers have reached the market in the past century. Increasing the levels of the main endogenous opioid peptides - enkephalins - by inhibiting their two inactivating ectopeptidases, neprilysin and aminopeptidase N, has analgesic effects in various models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Stemming from the same pharmacological concept, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitors have also been found to have analgesic effects in pain models by preventing the breakdown of endogenous cannabinoids. Dual enkephalinase inhibitors and FAAH inhibitors are now in early-stage clinical trials. In this Review, we compare the effects of these two potential classes of novel analgesics and describe the progress in their rational design. We also consider the challenges in their clinical development and opportunities for combination therapies.

Indexed as

AmidohydrolasesAnalgesicsAnimalsCannabinoid Receptor ModulatorsChronic PainEnkephalinsFatty Acid Amide HydrolasesHumansAmidohydrolasesAnalgesicsCannabinoid Receptor ModulatorsEnkephalinsFatty Acid Amide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID22460123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.