Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22459914›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2012

Prefrontal and limbic resting state brain network functional connectivity differs between nicotine-dependent smokers and non-smoking controls.

Amy C Janes, Lisa D Nickerson, Blaise De B Frederick, Marc J Kaufman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. A Novel Therapeutic Mechanism for Nicotine Craving in Schizophrenia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amy C JanesBrain Imaging Center, McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA 02478, USA. ajanes@mclean.harvard.edu
Lisa D Nickerson
Blaise De B Frederick
Marc J Kaufman
Imaging Center · USHarvard University · USMcLean Hospital · US

Funding

Training In Drug Abuse and Brain ImagingT32DA015036 · NIDA · MC LEAN HOSPITAL (BELMONT, MA) · PI SCOTT E LUKAS · 2002 to 2026
$5.3M
Drug Discovery Group for Nicotine Dependence TreatmentU01DA019378 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FAVA, MAURIZIO · 2004 to 2010
$3.2M
Training in Cognitive Function and Neuroimaging of Smoking-Related CuesK01DA029645 · NIDA · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI JANES, AMY C · 2011 to 2015
$853k
Realtime Near Infrared Spectroscopy of the Frontal Lobe for NeurofeedbackR21DA027877 · NIDA · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI FREDERICK, BLAISE DEBONNEVAL · 2010 to 2011
$424k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA029645NIDA NIH HHS K01DA029645NIDA NIH HHS R21DA027877NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA015036NIDA NIH HHS T32DA015036NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA019378NIDA NIH HHS U01DA019378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain dysfunction in prefrontal cortex (PFC) and dorsal striatum (DS) contributes to habitual drug use. These regions are constituents of brain networks thought to be involved in drug addiction. To investigate whether networks containing these regions differ between nicotine dependent female smokers and age-matched female non-smokers, we employed functional MRI (fMRI) at rest.

methodsData were processed with independent component analysis (ICA) to identify resting state networks (RSNs). We identified a subcortical limbic network and three discrete PFC networks: a medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) network and right and left lateralized fronto-parietal networks common to all subjects. We then compared these RSNs between smokers and non-smokers using a dual regression approach.

resultsSmokers had greater coupling versus non-smokers between left fronto-parietal and mPFC networks. Smokers with the greatest mPFC-left fronto-parietal coupling had the most DS smoking cue reactivity as measured during an fMRI smoking cue reactivity paradigm. This may be important because the DS plays a critical role in maintaining drug-cue associations. Furthermore, subcortical limbic network amplitude was greater in smokers.

conclusionsOur results suggest that prefrontal brain networks are more strongly coupled in smokers, which could facilitate drug-cue responding. Our data also are the first to document greater reward-related network fMRI amplitude in smokers. Our findings suggest that resting state PFC network interactions and limbic network amplitude can differentiate nicotine-dependent smokers from controls, and may serve as biomarkers for nicotine dependence severity and treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

AdultCuesDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLimbic SystemMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetParietal LobePrefrontal CortexPrincipal Component AnalysisRegression AnalysisRest

Identifiers

PMID22459914
PMCPMC3389311
OpenAlexW2154285752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.