Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22459407›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2012

Revisiting higher-order and large-scale chromatin organization.

Qian Bian, Andrew S Belmont

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A reappraisal of the form - function problem. Theory and phenomenology.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Physical Nature of Chromatin in the Nucleus.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Histone variants: the tricksters of the chromatin world.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2014
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qian BianDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, B107 CLSL, 601 S. Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Andrew S Belmont
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

CHROMATIN DOMAIN STRUCTURE/FUNCTIONR01GM058460 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BELMONT, ANDREW STEVEN · 1999 to 2025
$8.0M
Engineering stable, independent multi-transgene expression in mammalian cellsR01GM098319 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BELMONT, ANDREW STEVEN · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM58460NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058460NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past several years has seen increasing appreciation for plasticity of higher-level chromatin folding. Four distinct '30nm' chromatin fiber structures have been identified, while new in situ imaging approaches have questioned the universality of 30nm chromatin fibers as building blocks for chromosome folding in vivo. 3C-based approaches have provided a non-microscopic, genomic approach to investigating chromosome folding while uncovering a plethora of long-distance cis interactions difficult to accommodate in traditional hierarchical chromatin folding models. Recent microscopy based studies have suggested complex topologies co-existing within linear interphase chromosome structures. These results call for a reappraisal of traditional models of higher-level chromatin folding.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromosomesGenomeHumansInterphaseChromatin

Identifiers

PMID22459407
PMCPMC3372662
OpenAlexW2043379799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.