Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22458900›Full record

ReviewArchives of pathology & laboratory medicine2012

Emerging critical role of molecular testing in diagnostic genitourinary pathology.

George J Netto, Liang Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cell Cycle Markers in the Evaluation of Bladder Cancer.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020
    Article
  7. Molecular alterations associated with prostate cancer.Central European journal of urology · 2018
    Review
  8. Understanding the molecular pathogenesis and prognostics of bladder cancer: an overview.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2016
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma: should it be labeled as cancer?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

George J NettoDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA. gnetto1@jhmi.edu
Liang Cheng
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

TRANSGENIC MODELS FOR PROSTATE CANCER AND AUTOIMMUNITYP50CA058236 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DENMEADE, SAMUEL R · 1992 to 2020
$43.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe unprecedented advances in cancer genetics and genomics are rapidly affecting clinical management and diagnostics in solid tumor oncology. Molecular diagnostics is now an integral part of routine clinical management in patients with lung, colon, and breast cancer. In sharp contrast, molecular biomarkers have been largely excluded from current management algorithms of urologic malignancies.

objectiveTo discuss promising candidate biomarkers that may soon make their transition to the realm of clinical management of genitourologic malignancies. The need for new treatment alternatives that can improve upon the modest outcome so far in patients with several types of urologic cancer is evident. Well-validated prognostic molecular biomarkers that can help clinicians identify patients in need of early aggressive management are lacking. Identifying robust predictive biomarkers that will stratify response to emerging targeted therapeutics is another crucially needed development. A compiled review of salient studies addressing the topic could be helpful in focusing future efforts. DATA SOURCES: A PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) search for published studies with the following search terms was conducted: molecular , prognostic , targeted therapy , genomics , theranostics and urinary bladder cancer , prostate adenocarcinoma , and renal cell carcinoma . Articles with large cohorts and multivariate analyses were given preference.

conclusionsOur recent understanding of the complex molecular alterations involved in the development and progression of urologic malignancies is yielding novel diagnostic and prognostic molecular tools and opening the doors for experimental targeted therapies for these prevalent, frequently lethal solid tumors.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionGenomicsHumansMalePathology, MolecularPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22458900
PMCPMC3449141
OpenAlexW1977998325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.