ArticlePloS one2012
Microfluidic chip for molecular amplification of influenza A RNA in human respiratory specimens.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Miniaturized electrophoresis: An integrated microfluidic cartridge with functionalized hydrogel-assisted LAMP for sample-to-answer analysis of nucleic acid.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Article
- Sample-to-Answer Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Viremia Using Thermally Responsive Alkane Partitions.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Point-of-care testing for COVID-19: a simple two-step molecular diagnostic development and validation during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2024Article
- Sample-to-Answer Immuno-Magnetic Assay Using Thermally Responsive Alkane Partitions.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Current status, advances, challenges and perspectives on biosensors for COVID-19 diagnosis in resource-limited settings.Sensors and actuators reports · 2021Article
- Micro/nanotechnology-inspired rapid diagnosis of respiratory infectious diseases.Biomedical engineering letters · 2021Review
- An Overview on Microfluidic Systems for Nucleic Acids Extraction from Human Raw Samples.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A critical review of point-of-care diagnostic technologies to combat viral pandemics.Analytica chimica acta · 2021Review
- Nucleic Acid-Based Sensing Techniques for Diagnostics and Surveillance of Influenza.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Advances in point-of-care nucleic acid extraction technologies for rapid diagnosis of human and plant diseases.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2020Review
- Microfluidic-based approaches for COVID-19 diagnosis.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Review
- Detection of Bacterial and Viral Pathogens Using Photonic Point-of-Care Devices.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Advances in Chemical and Biological Methods to Identify Microorganisms-From Past to Present.Microorganisms · 2019Review
- A Solid-State Hard Microfluidic-Nanopore Biosensor with Multilayer Fluidics and On-Chip Bioassay/Purification Chamber.Advanced functional materials · 2018Article
- Analysis of PCR Kinetics inside a Microfluidic DNA Amplification System.Micromachines · 2018Article
- Loss of GSK-3 Causes Abnormal Astrogenesis and Behavior in Mice.Molecular neurobiology · 2016Article
- Microfluidic Organ/Body-on-a-Chip Devices at the Convergence of Biology and Microengineering.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Integrated Microfluidic Nucleic Acid Isolation, Isothermal Amplification, and Amplicon Quantification.Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Paper-Based RNA Extraction, in Situ Isothermal Amplification, and Lateral Flow Detection for Low-Cost, Rapid Diagnosis of Influenza A (H1N1) from Clinical Specimens.Analytical chemistry · 2015Article
- Thermally multiplexed polymerase chain reaction.Biomicrofluidics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A rapid, low cost, accurate point-of-care (POC) device to detect influenza virus is needed for effective treatment and control of both seasonal and pandemic strains. We developed a single-use microfluidic chip that integrates solid phase extraction (SPE) and molecular amplification via a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to amplify influenza virus type A RNA. We demonstrated the ability of the chip to amplify influenza A RNA in human nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) and nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens collected at two clinical sites from 2008-2010. The microfluidic test was dramatically more sensitive than two currently used rapid immunoassays and had high specificity that was essentially equivalent to the rapid assays and direct fluorescent antigen (DFA) testing. We report 96% (CI 89%,99%) sensitivity and 100% (CI 95%,100%) specificity compared to conventional (bench top) RT-PCR based on the testing of n = 146 specimens (positive predictive value = 100%(CI 94%,100%) and negative predictive value = 96%(CI 88%,98%)). These results compare well with DFA performed on samples taken during the same time period (98% (CI 91%,100%) sensitivity and 96%(CI 86%,99%) specificity compared to our gold standard testing). Rapid immunoassay tests on samples taken during the enrollment period were less reliable (49%(CI 38%,61%) sensitivity and 98%(CI 98%,100%) specificity). The microfluidic test extracted and amplified influenza A RNA directly from clinical specimens with viral loads down to 10³ copies/ml in 3 h or less. The new test represents a major improvement over viral culture in terms of turn around time, over rapid immunoassay tests in terms of sensitivity, and over bench top RT-PCR and DFA in terms of ease of use and portability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.