Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22457489›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Network analysis of corticocortical connections reveals ventral and dorsal processing streams in mouse visual cortex.

Quanxin Wang, Olaf Sporns, Andreas Burkhalter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 223 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
223citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

223 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 443 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Highly selective visual receptive fields in mouse frontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article

163 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quanxin WangDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Olaf Sporns
Andreas Burkhalter
Washington University in St. Louis · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Formation of Cortical Areas and CircuitsR01EY016184 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BURKHALTER, ANDREAS HANS · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
CORTICAL CIRCUITRY FOR TOP-DOWN SELECTION OF VISUAL INPUTSR01EY020523 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BURKHALTER, ANDREAS HANS · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016184NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020523NEI NIH HHS R01EY16184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the information used for visual perception and visually guided actions is processed in complex networks of connections within the cortex. To understand how this works in the normal brain and to determine the impact of disease, mice are promising models. In primate visual cortex, information is processed in a dorsal stream specialized for visuospatial processing and guided action and a ventral stream for object recognition. Here, we traced the outputs of 10 visual areas and used quantitative graph analytic tools of modern network science to determine, from the projection strengths in 39 cortical targets, the community structure of the network. We found a high density of the cortical graph that exceeded that shown previously in monkey. Each source area showed a unique distribution of projection weights across its targets (i.e., connectivity profile) that was well fit by a lognormal function. Importantly, the community structure was strongly dependent on the location of the source area: outputs from medial/anterior extrastriate areas were more strongly linked to parietal, motor, and limbic cortices, whereas lateral extrastriate areas were preferentially connected to temporal and parahippocampal cortices. These two subnetworks resemble dorsal and ventral cortical streams in primates, demonstrating that the basic layout of cortical networks is conserved across species.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleIontophoresisMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, StatisticalNeural PathwaysNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesNeuronal Tract-TracersVisual CortexNeuronal Tract-Tracers

Identifiers

PMID22457489
PMCPMC3328193
OpenAlexW2022387796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.